25th February 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Skerries school closure would bring ‘instant depopulation’, claim islanders

1 comment, , by , in News

Click on image to enlarge.

“Instant depopulation” and the destruction of a rural community would be the outcome should the SIC press ahead with its proposal to shut Skerries’ three-pupil secondary department, islanders told councillors and officials during a public meeting last night.

More than 40 members of the community – over half the population – were in attendance for the passionate but fairly even-tempered two-hour session. Visiting council representatives were left in no doubt about the continued strength of opposition from a community which has successfully fended off previous attempts to scrap the one-classroom secondary.

In June, the SIC agreed to formally consult on a closure which it believes will save £62,000 a year from its runaway £38 million a year education budget, though that figure was fervently disputed by several in attendance at the community’s public hall.

Chairman of the council’s services committee Gussie Angus presided over proceedings and kicked off by explaining that the Blueprint for Education exercise was being conducted against a backdrop of falling school rolls and increased centralisation of population in and around Lerwick. He pointed to statistics showing a projected 31 per cent decrease in pupil numbers across Shetland over the next 20 years.

Mr Angus said the council had a responsibility to provide equal opportunity and access to education for young people, which was “a difficulty in a dispersed island community like this”. He also drew attention to the recent scathing verdict of the Accounts Commission over the council’s failure to competently manage its finances at a time of imminent cutbacks to its block grant from Holyrood.

A local resident and father of two school pupils, Ryan Arthur, eloquently expressed many people’s fears over the knock-on impact for the community’s fragile economy. He and others were annoyed at the suggestion within the proposal paper that there will be “no detrimental effect” on its sustainability.

The economy of Out Skerries, made up of the islands of Housay and Bruray and with a population estimated to be around 80, is heavily reliant on the lucrative Bound Skerries Salmon company. It provides employment for eight people between its farm and processing factory. Fishing boats also offer a steady source of income.

But Mr Arthur said that any families with secondary-age children would have no alternative but to up sticks and leave if the department closes, and he suggested the salmon firm would be likely to go down the tubes along with it. “The effect will be depopulation,” he said. “We make our industry here; we don’t depend on handouts to survive. But none of us wants to lose our bairns at the age of 11 years old.”

Head of economic development Neil Grant accepted that more work on the possible economic impact needed to be done, but that such a study would have to be clearly defined. He said it would be difficult to prove “in any meaningful sense” that the salmon farm would cease to exist should the secondary department shut.

Head of schools Helen Budge defended her department’s report on the grounds that the only direct loss of employment in the isles would be the school’s secondary teacher, as the nursery and primary departments will remain open.

But there was anger, too, at the report’s suggestion that pupils would receive a better quality of education at the Anderson High School. Mrs Budge said children would have more opportunity to interact with peers, while SIC representatives also pointed to the community of Fair Isle where pupils head to the AHS at the age of 11 or 12 with parents’ blessing.

The school’s parent council chairwoman Denise Anderson – a prominent figure in the island’s past successes in staving off the closure threat – said she believed the department provided the best education and learning environment for the island’s children. A mother of seven children, six of whom are being educated in Skerries at present, she said the excellent exam results of her son John would not have been replicated on the mainland.

Fears were also expressed about children as young as 11 having to spend long ferry journeys in rough seas travelling to and from Lerwick.

SIC vice-convener and North Isles councillor Josie Simpson was one of the five councillors – along with Mr Angus, education spokesman Bill Manson, North Isles member Robert Henderson and Lerwick North councillor Allan Wishart – present. He pointed to the arrested population decline in Fetlar, which had slipped below 50 but after a concerted effort has now bounced back to 66 people.

“We have to be careful,” he said, adding there was “much more to consider” than education. “If we don’t take heed of the people, we could be faced with the same here.”

But with only five of the 22 elected members present, Melanie Gorman suggested that if councillors were going to take a “life-changing decision” for the community, the least they could do would be to come and see the situation on the ground before doing so.

The consultation period runs until Sunday 10th October, after which the evidence gathered will be included in a consultation report. It is expected councillors will be asked to decide whether or not to recommend closure in December. Should they choose to shut the school, the decision will be referred to Scottish ministers who have a six-week period to decide whether to intervene.

• Anyone wishing to contribute to the consultation can do so in writing to Blueprint for Education, Schools Service, Hayfield House, Hayfield Lane, Lerwick, ZE1 0QD, or by emailing [ mailto:blueprintforeducation@shetland.gov.uk ]blueprintforeducation@shetland.gov.uk.

Tags:

About Neil Riddell

View other stories by »

One comment

  1. Kevin T Robertson

    As i worked on the Skerries Ferry for a few years i know how important it is for the future of there island to keep there secondary department open. I have witnessed there community pull themselves through a down turn in there Salmon Farm, Quota cuts for there fishing fleet and a dip in there population.

    I think it is real credit to the community of Skerries that they have worked hard to pull there community through this hard times. I think at one point the population was nearly as low as 60 but know it’s starting to grow to around 80 with alot of young families. This is an island that is working hard and succeeding to keep their hard working community thriving.

    I find it really hard to believe with the money that our Council have squandered on other areas of Shetland that they have decided to punish Skerries to save £62,000. Our councillors keep saying they have to start to take bold decisions to make the savings to sustain Shetlands oil reserves for the future. Don’t punish the ones who are trying to maintain working Communities.

    I Find it really hard to believe that on the same week our Councillors decided to punish the future of the Community of Skerries they decide they have to make savings of £50,000 from inside the council to fund a Tunnel Managers job. The Council already have Officials employed who are well capable of doing this job without spending money that could go along way in keeping the Skerries Secondary department open.

    I hope the Councillors who take these harsh decisions can live with themselves when they sit back in the Council Chambers and hold there hands up and vote to destroy a hard working Community. I hope you can think long and hard before you vote. For once try and do whats best for our Island communities not a short term fix to try and justify your positions.

    I wish the Skerries Community all the best with there fight to keep there Secondary Department open for the sake of there future generations.

    K T Robertson

    Whalsay

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

Win a £20 Voucher Complete our survey today
10 Winners will be drawn at random from completed entries
No thanks Take survey No thanks