Not a suitable landscape
Travel, they say, broadens the mind. Aye, perhaps. But it has closed mine to Viking Energy’s plan to destroy a landscape and environment which is curiously inappropriate for this type of industrial development.
Over the past few years I have had the good fortune to sail to many out-of-the-way places and make landfall at numerous Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Antarctic islands. This has allowed me to see and tramp though environments ranging from coral and volcanic islands, through temperate and tropical rainforests and rivers to cloud forests, button grass moorlands and into the glaciers and ice in Patagonia and the margins of the polar regions.
Returning home after these trips I have repeatedly been struck by the sheer visual beauty of our tiny archipelago. While seascapes tend to dominate our impressions, the landscape is open and views unrestricted; nothing is hidden. The hills – with their grand but subtle seasonal changes of colour – are low and generally rounded with soft skylines. Shetland does not compare in scale and grandeur with many of the strange and stunning landscapes I have seen elsewhere but it is very special. It has the Goldilocks factor: often bare but never barren, wild but not harsh, majestic but not overpowering, sometimes bold but never brutal. It is, in short, just about right.
I have seen windfarms in Tasmania and Norway where they are dwarfed by the landscape. And in Denmark, where it is so flat that at any distance the turbines fall below the horizon and are soon blocked by nearer features, while offshore one can sail past monster windspeils and marvel at their clever design and engineering.
Here, there is nothing to mitigate the sheer size of Viking’s beasts; nothing to reduce their visual impact and nothing to hide them. Their elevation magnifies their presence. By its nature the plan relies on placing these machines on prominent skylines and destroying precious moorland and lovely – and much loved – open vistas.
It is sad that so many people are willing to foul their own backyard and as we now know a connection to the mainland will result in many more windfarms springing up throughout the isles. Viking, we might say, is the blunt end of a very long and hard wedge.
Viking’s apologists talk sneeringly of nimbys trying to stop the project because we don’t like the look of these whirling giants, or that we think they will “spoil the view”. They will certainly do that – big time. Our environment is about to be destroyed by the “renewables” industry subsidy junkies and their local and central government acolytes, and, apart from lodging our objections, there seems little we can do about it.