23rd September 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Doubt cast on legality of referendum as trustees voice frustration

1 comment, , by , in News

Plans to stage a community-wide referendum on the make-up of Shetland Charitable Trust remain shrouded in uncertainty after trustees heard today that there was “some doubt” about the legality of such a poll.

Legal firm Turcan Connell has indicated verbally to trust chairman Bill Manson that it is “at least dubious” whether the trust deed permits it to carry out a referendum. But the lawyers are waiting to hear what Scotland’s charities regulator OSCR makes of the idea before delivering fuller guidance to trustees.

In September trustees voted 11-9 to ask the community whether they wanted to maintain the status quo, plump for direct elections or endorse the trust reform group’s idea of selecting eight trustees to sit alongside seven SIC councillors. At present all councillors, except Allan Wishart, are joined by the Lord Lieutenant and the Anderson High School’s head teacher.

Mr Manson, who is strongly against the referendum idea, said it was his duty to examine whether the move could leave trustees at risk of being penalised.

At this morning’s trust meeting in Lerwick Town Hall, several trustees voiced frustration that little progress has been made. Councillor-trustee Gary Robinson said he was “really annoyed” at what he viewed as “prevarication”, while others questioned why the trust needed to wait for OSCR’s opinion before getting on with organising the referendum.

Jonathan Wills wants to see the situation sorted out before May’s council elections, and Betty Fullerton asked: “Why are [the trust’s lawyers] waiting for something from OSCR, which is a completely different organisation?”

Mr Manson said a “fair amount of preliminary work” had been carried out. He did not believe the referendum was being delayed, as it was unlikely to be staged until around February or March in any case. A number of details need to be ironed out, including whether Shetlanders over the age of 16 are to be included in the poll.

After Sandy Cluness sprung the surprise idea at the trust’s September meeting, Mr Manson dismissed the referendum as a “time-wasting tactic by the backwoodsmen”. He remains implacably opposed and points out that its outcome would not be binding on trustees, who would still have final say over the trust’s future direction.

“There is at least some doubt as to whether it’s a legitimate use of trust funds,” Mr Manson told The Shetland Times. “If OSCR decides it’s not, there is a possibility of penalties on trustees … or they might say ‘hold the referendum, but pay for it yourselves’.”

He added: “I think the trustees have a duty to make decisions regarding the use of the trust funds and on the constitution of the trust, and I think a referendum is an unnecessary step in arriving at the point where they make that decision, and one which soaks up some money.”

OSCR has been telling the £200 million trust for several years that it must make changes to distance itself from Shetland Islands Council. Mr Cluness – who was absent from today’s meeting – has fiercely resisted that notion, saying he believes the trust has done Shetland proud for the past 35 years. It had taken the trust more than 20 meetings over two years and extensive legal advice from top QC Roy Martin to draw up its proposal before the SIC convener deployed his bolt from the blue.

Trust general manager Ann Black said OSCR was being pressed for a response. Once the regulator makes its feelings known, a special trust meeting could be called. Last month David Robb took the reins at the charities regulator, replacing long-standing chief executive Jane Ryder, which may partly account for its delayed reaction.

Tags:

About Neil Riddell

View other stories by »

One comment

  1. Charitable Trust Fund:

    In the long run the trust should be a totally seperate entity from the council, with councillors having no say on the operation and the spending of the trust’s income. Over the years one could say that the council has used the trust’s money to deliver services the council should have been responsible for in the first place. A blind man could see the conflict of interest with more interest placed on the council’s side for the CONTROL of the fund’s purse string’s.

    I have said before the trust should be run by various types of people made up with professional’s such as Oil and Gas leasing expert, a International thinking Banker, Scottish Edinburgh based international accountant, a member of OSCR, and some business people, perhaps a financial advisor, and members of the shetland born community.

    Nowadays a person can be based almost anywhere with the proper web cams we can have meetings with experts based on mainland Scotland at any time day or night, new technology opens up the chance to have these people on board. In my forthcoming book ” HOW TO DEAL WITH OIL AND GAS COMPANIES”. I will show how different communities throughout the world have been corrupted by the multinationals.

    Also if there is to be a referendom all sixteen years olds must be included in it, it’s their future and their community so let’s hear them.

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.