25th February 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Councillors asked to consider closure of Lerwick’s Viking Bus Station as part of cutbacks

The Viking Bus Station in Lerwick, which provides a vital crutch for bus users and a hub for sending freight packages to rural areas of Shetland, could be one of the victims of Shetland Islands Council’s colossal spending cutbacks.

Shutting down the Lerwick bus station and freight centre would save an estimated £67,961, with a possible £12,000 to be levered in by renting the building out for other purposes, according to the cuts report which will go before councillors on Thursday.

Setting the budget for 2012/13, members will consider a package of measures aimed at saving up to £28 million over the next two years from its £127 million annual budget, including £9 million-worth of ongoing “efficiency” savings made in the current financial year.

The Viking Bus Station provides a waiting room and left luggage service for bus users, some of whom the report acknowledges are “often the most vulnerable” in society. Its closure would also make it more difficult to securely pick up and deliver small items of freight, which keeps the station bustling with deliveries and collections on weekday mornings, particularly on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Alternative ways of providing rural freight collections and a left luggage service should be investigated, the report suggests. “If the station was to close these services would be lost, unless other manned premises could undertake the task,” it states.

As well as stripping millions of pounds from education and social care spending (see earlier story), the infrastructure budget will be hit hard. Members are being asked to consider measures amounting to nearly £2.5 million of savings through changes to a variety of services in the year ahead, and a further £900,000 in 2013/14.

The bulk of that will come from yet to be defined inter-island ferry services cuts. A comprehensive review is being carried out and should be published in the summer, spelling out how the SIC will save nearly £1.5 million over two years. North Isles councillors have spoken of how they fear swingeing cuts to ferry timetables are inevitable.

Winter gritting is to be cut back to save £375,000 in the year ahead, which could prevent many people – particularly those living in remote areas – from getting to work, school or college. With fewer gritters and fewer roads being treated, it is “highly likely that this would result in redundancies” once a review of the service is completed.

Four part-time neighbourhood support workers will be axed to save £80,000, risking an increase in anti-social behaviour. It will mean less resources to tackle underage drinking, bullying and littering, and less support for vulnerable housing and social work clients.

Maintenance of roads and pavements will be reduced, while switching off street lights in some areas might save around £25,000. Cuts to street cleansing mean there is likely to be more litter, chewing gum and weeds on the streets of Lerwick and Scalloway, with each settlement standing to lose a cleaning worker.

The council will no longer provide a Christmas tree and lights, something the council believes businesses or community groups should be funding.

Neighbouring Orkney makes £100,000 a year from charging for the use of 302 parking spaces, and meters could be introduced in Lerwick to generate a similar sum for the SIC.

After two public toilets in Lerwick were closed last year, half a dozen rural loos are now in the firing line. Savings of £5,000 apiece could be achieved by shutting down public toilets at Jarlshof, Bressay, Hamnavoe, Sandness, Hillswick and Uyeasound.

Tingwall Airport could be shut on Saturdays and for a half-day during the week to save £20,000. Because it is used by the air ambulance, a third full-time person must be on duty to act as a fireman – the council is to investigate whether the NHS ought to be paying for the service.

Free inter-island ferry fares for concessionary pass holders could be a thing of the past – instead, concessions will be asked to pay 50 per cent fares. The council says that if the scheme is targeted at those on low incomes, it could improve equality across the islands.

The full cuts proposals are contained in appendices 2 and 3 of SIC head of finance Hazel Sutherland’s report to councillors.

Tags:

About Neil Riddell

View other stories by »

4 comments

  1. Maureen Bell

    I am appalled by the proposed ‘cuts’ for what most folk would consider essential services. There is no mention of cutbacks to the budgets for transportation and accommodation costs for councillors and officers outside of Shetland.

    Interesting!

    Reply
  2. David Spence

    Not including the Parking charges (which is an additional income, not a saving), the total potential savings in the article above come to £609,961.

    How much did the council pay out last week? Did anyone notice the small article where £672,500 was awarded away in grants and “loans”?

    As mentioned before in these comments, almost half a million is being thrown away on a Royal holiday “because they may look bad”.

    Just a couple of examples of the countless millions spent willy-nilly throughout the year.

    My point is that all the savings we are seeing suggested are minuscule in comparison to the amounts councilors deal with on a weekly basis.

    It only takes squashing 16 £2 million “investments”, or “reviews” to save £33 million, which the average member of the public will never notice. However it takes closing a hell of a lot of toilets at £5000 a time, something everyone will notice sooner or later!

    Reply
  3. John Thomsom

    Quote:
    “a possible £12,000 to be levered in by renting the building out for other purposes, according to the cuts report”

    I take it the Author of said report hasn’t walked along da street lately, not many takers for the many already empty premises.

    Reply
  4. Alistair Tulloch

    For many weeks as I drive home past the Voehead of Weisdale, I wonder if the SIC are really interested in saving money. I refer to the complete renewal of the crash barriers at the head of the voe. Now before anyone writes in to comment that the old barrier posts are wood, I can tell you that the existing wood posts are in good condition, so the whole exercise is nothing but a waste of money. And its been going on for years as far as I can tell, and its not a few hundred pounds, but tens of thousands of pounds. I think that its time that we look to the French for some initiative – bring back the gillotene!!

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

Win a £20 Voucher Complete our survey today
10 Winners will be drawn at random from completed entries
No thanks Take survey No thanks