New Eric Gray ‘a step further ahead’

2 comments, , by , in Headlines, News

The proposal to build a new facility providing day services for adults with learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorders and complex needs is being backed by councillors,  following a committee meeting.

The council’s special social services committee was presented with options for future provision on Thursday.

In a packed and lengthy meeting various options were discussed – with a presentation by parent and carer members of a working group concerned with users’ needs. Speaking on behalf of working group members, Leslie Smith argued the best option was development of a purpose built facility, with a site at Seafield currently being set aside for this purpose.

The other options under consideration were: 

To continue to use the current Eric Gray Centre at Kantersted and the additional support needs building at Gressy Loan – with significant repairs and upgrade work needed at the Eric Gray Centre.

Or to extend one of the existing facilities – to modify or extend existing buildings to meet projected needs, either the Eric Gray Centre or Gressy Loan, or potentially another building.

Mr Smith argued there would be reduced revenue costs in running a new building and maintaining it and it would be accessible to all tier groups and close to existing associated facilities. “The location [Seafield] makes it ideal for clients in wheelchairs and with mobility issues as they are able to go for walks in the town and to facilities in the town on foot fairly readily.

“This is a huge benefit for clients and carers. Dependency on transport is significantly reduced.”

During the meeting it was revealed the estimated capital cost of a purpose-built new centre would be £5.65 million.

If this was funded from borrowing it would result in an additional revenue cost with a “ballpark figure” of £367,000 per year for the next 25 years.

However members were told the cost of the new build was based on figures from 2008 and previous plans for a new centre.

Director of corporate services Christine Ferguson said there was a lack of details on the options being discussed.

She recommended that officers came back to the committee with more detailed work such as if re-housing users would be possible in relation to the options put forward, and how much it would cost, and funding packages regarding a new build.

SIC Councillor Cecil Smith pic 2Committee chairman Cecil Smith had promised a report would be presented to the committee by the end of March.

He said after the meeting: “We are at that step further ahead now. I did ask for a report back by the end of March and we got the report today in front of us.

“Some detail was not there but that’s not down to any fault of the officers that’s probably purely lack of time.

“I think that we had a good presentation from the families today and we had a very good debate and questions in the chamber and the decision that we made I think was the correct decision.

“I do realise there’s still some work to be done and that will be done in due course.”

An additional report will be put before the social services committee prior to the recommendation being presented to the SIC executive committee. The final decision will rest with the full council.

About Adam Guest

View other stories by »

2 comments

  1. Sandy McMillan

    Don’t get me wrong I am all in favour of Care Homes in Shetland, It is one thing that the Shetland Islands Council have got right, Has any of the Councillors ever looked into who owns the ground at Seafield, or are they ignoring how it was acquired.
    Well as it stands it was gifted to the people of Lerwick and Shetland, on the condition it was left as a green belt area, for recreational purposes by a gentleman by the name of Mr George Keith Anderson, This all was done by a hand shake at the time which in my eyes is a Gentleman’s agreement and should not be broken.
    Is it possible for the Councillors that passed this for planning, came to acquire this ground for building on, As I have said I am not against a care home being built, only I would like to know is how they got there hands on this particular plot.

    Reply
  2. Dave Cooper

    Sandy has asked a pertinent question about the use of the Seafield land. Will SIC ( Shetland Islands Council ) come up with an answer. Should I be holding my breath ?

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>