Highlands and Islands MSP urges rethink over school closure plans

7 comments, , by , in Headlines, News

Highlands and Islands MSP Mike MacKenzie wants chief executive of Shetland Islands Council Mark Boden to think again about possible school closures in the isles.

Mr MacKenzie sent an open letter to the council chief last month, expressing a number of concerns from parents over the re-organisation plans for education.

Today he met with Mr Boden to discuss the matter further – to see what could be done by the council to improve the consultation process, and ensure the council shares the appropriate information so parents feel properly consulted.

Mr MacKenzie said he would ask for a “longer-term” view of Shetland to be considered.

He said he realised the SIC had gone through a “very difficult time” with its budgets but said Shetland had “a very bright future”.

He spoke about the “renaissance” in the oil and gas industry and the potential for renewable energy in the isles.

In the next 10 years there would be potentially 3,000 jobs available through renewable energy, Mr MacKenzie said.

As employment levels in the isles are high, “that implies 3,000 new people coming to Shetland, and their families,” said Mr MacKenzie .

“Even if half of that’s realised over the next decade that’s a big increase in population. Those people that move here from other parts of the country have got a vision of coming to live in a rural community and part of what Shetland has to offer is very high-quality education.

“So I would think very carefully before proposing to close down those small schools that do offer very high-quality education.”

Mr MacKenzie argued statistics “overwhelmingly suggest” small rural schools do much better in terms of educational outcomes than the bigger ones.

He said the case for closing schools could only be made if it was an attempt to improve educational outcomes.

But often the underlying factor is the need to save money, he said.

“Legislation specifically rules that out and can’t be your principal aim in approaching school closures”.

The SIC is looking to save more than £3 million through its schools reconfiguration project. This week proposals to close two schools in Northmavine – Urafirth primary and nursery and North Roe primary saving £190,000 -were up for discussion – with heated discussions  between councillors and the public.

However Mr MacKenzie said the council would receive more money through a higher population in the isles in future, and there was more government money per pupil for smaller schools with fewer than 70 children on the roll.

Transport costs would also be an added expense if rural schools closed, he said.

He said he would like to see the council look at other alternatives to save the money and school closures should be “the final resort”.

“Of course there will be alternatives and I think maybe when the council realise the depth of concern that people have, and the number of people that share those concerns across the community, then it behoves them to maybe think again, have a look, see if you can sharpen your pencil.

“Be very sure that any savings you think you might realise in the proposed closures are actually real savings to be made and then look very carefully to see if you can find other means of achieving the same kind of savings.”

Mr MacKenzie said the full economic implications of closing a school also had to be considered, as sometimes when you close a school “you shut down the area”, he said.

He spoke of other options and “proactive planning” – such as whether houses could be built in the area to improve the school roll.

Councillors should take a “broader, more holistic view”, he added.

Things are already beginning to look up for the council, said Mr MacKenzie, with progress on the housing debt issue and the benefits of the oil and gas industry.

“There’s room maybe not to save every school, but there’s room maybe to approach this with a more optimistic attitude and maybe accommodate the views and needs of parents in a way that might not have been possible a year ago.”

The Shetland Times tried to contact Mr Boden following the meeting but he was unavailable to comment.

About Adam Guest

View other stories by »

7 comments

  1. john nicolson

    blatant attempt at vote catching shut your mouth or actually come with some money to pay for it.

    Reply
  2. ALAN SKINNER

    Good grief, a sensible politician with vision! Please tell me how I can vote for him.

    Alan Skinner
    Cullivoe
    Yell

    Reply
  3. Charles Smith

    Pointless! It’s not Boden who is closing schools it’s the councillors!

    Reply
  4. john irvine

    At last! someone who talks common sense. Take note hidden agenda council.

    If the council really want to save then why not clear out all the dead wood, half of those working at hayfield house for example? it would make no difference to any of the services provide either! and that could be just a starter.

    Reply
  5. David Clark

    Sounds like a political decision, and the challenge should be put to the political leader.

    Reply
  6. Ali Inkster

    The only way we will get anything other than platitudes from either Westminster or Edinburgh is to take it back for ourselves. This council has betrayed the people of Shetland by acting in the Governments interests and not ours. The Our islands our future is a sham to keep us quiet until its all too late. Time for change is here.

    Reply
  7. Robert Duncan

    “He said the case for closing schools could only be made if it was an attempt to improve educational outcomes.

    But often the underlying factor is the need to save money, he said.

    “Legislation specifically rules that out and can’t be your principal aim in approaching school closures”.”

    I understand it when this comment comes from parents and members of the public, but would expect a politician to check his facts. The legislation does not “specifically rule out” anything, and indeed clearly sets out that likely effects on “the pupils of any other schools in the authority’s area” should be covered in the education benefit statement.

    Hopefully small rural primaries aren’t seen as an easier target than secondary schools, now that all the dithering there has only served to increase the savings requirement.

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others. Comments are moderated. Moderators have been instructed to approve or reject comments but not to edit them. Comments may therefore be withheld due to one incautious phrase in an otherwise acceptable contribution.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>