Big turnout expected for Cure march

3 comments, , by , in Headlines, News
A large group of Whalsay residents got to gether to spell out CURE on the isle's Harbison Park. Photo: Ivan Reid

A large group of Whalsay residents got to gether to spell out CURE on the isle’s Harbison Park. Photo: Ivan Reid


Hundreds of people are expected to march through Lerwick’s town centre tomorrow to take a stand against possible school closures.
 
Pressure group Cure – Communities United for Rural Education – will take to the streets in protest over the far-reaching changes.
 
It comes as Education Scotland, the organi­sation responsible for “supporting quality and improvement in learning and teaching”, has cast doubt on whether the S1-S2 model being considered by the SIC has any educational benefit.
 
An estimated 500 people could attend the march, with bus-loads expected to arrive in the town from Unst, Yell and Whalsay. Others are also anticipated to arrive from Aith, Sandwick and the North Mainland.
 
The march is due to leave the Market Cross at 11am, before heading through Commercial Street and back along the Esplanade to the cross. Organisers say it is being billed as a “celebration” of rural education.
 
It also comes ahead of crunch meetings in the town hall on Monday to decide the future of Sandwick Junior High School. Members are due to debate ending lessons for S3 and S4 pupils.
 
However, the idea of continuing lessons for S1 and S2 youngsters at Sandwick has become an idea few are keen on, after Education Scotland indicated a clear case for it had “not been made”. The education authority also says the current S1-S4 arrangement at Sandwick  is no longer viable.
 
In a Sounding Off piece in this week’s paper, education and families chairwoman Vaila Wishart suggests S1-S3 should instead be considered for schools in the North Isles, while S1-S3 or closure could be earmarked for mainland junior highs.
 
She warned the council should avoid “backing off” from making hard calls in the way the previous authority did,  highlighting a cost per secondary pupil of just under £14,000 – more than double the national average. The isles, she says, cater for fewer than 1,500 pupils in their secondary years.
 
“We need to move on. I am optimistic that this council is not going to follow the behaviour of previous councils by taking fright and backing off from making tough decisions halfway through the term, because as well as representing the opinions of people in our wards, we are all signed up to the medium term financial plan and have to look at the bigger picture. The choices get tougher as the options narrow.”
 
She warns keeping the school estate as it is and meeting the SIC’s medium term financial goals could – in a worst case scenario where £2.5 million of savings are sought – result in the removal of all school operating budgets and reduce the subject choices for secondary education.
 
She also says sticking to an S1-S4 model of education would leave the council struggling to offer the “exciting” Shetland Learning Partnership project, which has been developed, to all pupils.
 
“It must be clear now to all but the most die-hard opponents of change to the junior high school system that S1-S4 is no longer viable because of the way the curriculum is being provided.”
 
However, Jonathan Wills says the council should press ahead for closure. In November Dr Wills spoke out against the motion by education and families vice chairman George Smith to consult on keeping Sandwick and Aith schools open until the end of S2.
 
Speaking this week to The Shetland Times, Dr Wills described the idea as “a dog’s break­fast”, and insisted the council should move for closure.
 
“If the S1-S2 version has failed to convince Scottish education officials then obviously we haven’t made the case for it. And that’s because it can’t be made. We’ve done our best, but it’s not going to work.”
 
He also wondered what the effect would be on schools in the North Isles “if money is being spent unnecessarily on too many schools elsewhere.”
 
“That’s why I’ve been surprised to see the North Isles members voting, so far, for a policy which I don’t think is in their consti­tuency’s best interest.
 
“Likewise, I am a bit surprised that some Lerwick members don’t understand that, if you spend money on Sandwick and Aith unnecessarily, there will be less for the pupils in the Anderson High.
 
“The Anderson High is not a Lerwick school, purely. It’s for the whole of Shetland. Every single ward in Shetland sends pupils to Anderson High.”
 
Organiser Gordon Thomson said tomorrow’s march was designed to “concentrate the mind” ahead of Monday’s town hall meetings. But even protesters, it seems, have little truck with the S1-S2 model.
 
“We feel that if Sandwick becomes an S1-S2 school, the other junior high schools will probably follow suit, even though there are consultations still to take place. I think it would be the beginning of the end.
 
“Our attitude would be we would like to see S1-S4 schools. We are holding out for what we think is the best option.”
 
He said he was looking forward to a strong turn-out at Saturday’s march. “We are deliberately billing it as a cele­bration of rural education.
 
“Some of these things in the past have been a bit personal and some of the slogans, and so on, have not been terribly complimentary. We are consciously trying to avoid that. We appreciate what’s been done for education in the past, and we would like that to continue.
 
“We’re perfectly happy with the set-up at the moment. We feel the Anderson High and Brae High School do a good job. We’re not criticising them. We feel that there is consider­able investment in these [rural] schools in terms of resources and staffing, and we’d like to see them continuing, otherwise you will have a gradual drift towards the centre.”
 
However, centralisation is not something Dr Wills is worried about. He insists closing country schools will benefit all of Shetland. He described the previous model for secondary schools as “a time-warp”.
 
“It’s a very pleasant, comfortable time-warp, but we can’t afford it any longer, and now it doesn’t actually deliver the education that’s required under Curriculum for Excel­lence – and that’s not fair.
 
“It’s not fair to pupils in the junior highs and it’s certainly not fair to pupils in Brae and Anderson High, whose resources are being reduced because we’re persisting with junior highs.”
 
● A petition has been launched calling for the Clickimin campsite, which has been closed to allow the construction of the new Anderson High School, to be saved.
 
Sandwick woman Carina McLatchie is urging the SIC to think again. She says it would be “ideal” if an alternative solution could be found which would allow the new school and the campsite to sit alongside one another.

Her online petition had secured almost 700 supporters by Wednesday afternoon.

About Ryan Taylor

Ryan Taylor is a reporter at The Shetland Times

View other stories by »

3 comments

  1. Ali Inkster

    Good luck, I will be with you in spirit if not in body. The way this council are treating our children is utterly disgraceful, they have no problem causing this much upset in the community but are unwilling to upset Edinburgh or Westminster, you have to wonder why.

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/shetland-islands-council-resign?recruiter=30548335&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition

    Reply
  2. Janet Dunnet

    Personally everyone should fill the town because I think this school closures are pathetic they should knock down the Anderson High School and put all the children out to country schools while new 1 is built on same site lets see how many town people etc would like that because the country people seem to have to put up with this nonsense ……

    Reply
  3. John Tulloch

    Jonathan thinks councillors should only vote in the narrow interests of their own constituencies, however, all councillors have a duty to do what’s best for Shetland and the isles councillors have rumbled the Lerwick-centred strategy of ‘divide and conquer’.

    The isles councillors are not fools. They know that if they permit the standard ‘salami-slicing’ approach to be applied to Sandwick/Aith, it won’t stop there and when their turn comes, they will be unable to block it because those councillors who have already lost schools will have nothing to gain by supporting them, indeed, they will lose whatever is on offer from the Lerwick-centred ‘Wills-ite’ coalition to keep them on board with the closures.

    Remember the Skerries on-carry and beware of siren voices, offering ‘deals’ to save your schools.

    Rural councillors must stand firm behind CURE or your communities will pay the price in the end.

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>