Gray offers reassurance over high school budget

8 comments, , by , in Headlines, News

Councillors have been assured the new Anderson High School should be completed within budget.

Head of the SIC’s finance department, James Gray, has told members the project is still on track to be built within its £42 million limit.

The new school is the council’s flagship project, with £28 million of the cost coming from the Scottish government. The council is considering external borrowing to fund the new school.

The question of a possible overspend was raised by audit commitee chairman Allison Duncan, who wondered whether it would be up to the SIC to stump up the extra cost if it did go over budget.

“If the budget has to be overspent, for any reason, on the Anderson High School project, where does the funding come from – the Scottish government or the council?”

SIC head of finance James Gray.

SIC head of finance James Gray.

Mr Gray said there were “no guarantees” – not least because the exercise was, so far, being carried out on paper. But he insisted indications showed the school should cost no more than the allotted funds.

He also pointed to a £2.5 million contingency earmarked for any “abnormal costs”.

He said the authority would aim to have discussions with the Scottish Futures Trust if the project started costing too much.

“I suspect we’d stand a chance of getting extra funding,” he told councillors.

Meanwhile, a report outlining differences in secondary education costs between Shetland and other island groups is due to go before councillors next month.

Members heard July’s education and families committee would receive a report showing the disparity between Shetland secondary education and that of Orkney and the Western Isles.

One contributing factor is believed to be that the SIC includes in its schools’ budget figures relating to early retirement, whereas, in Orkney, the costs are separately absorbed.

The issue came up at today’s audit committee meeting, where Mr Duncan praised finance staff, he said, for helping bring the council out of the “mire” it found itself in four years ago.

But he warned challenges still had to be faced for years to come, in particular, with the council’s moves towards school closures which has already seen hundreds turn out in protest.

Mr Duncan described positive findings presented by Audit Scotland – in which no so-called “red card” warnings featured, compared with eight in 2010 – as “music to my ears”.

Councillor Allison Duncan said he was fighting for what he saw as justice.

Councillor Allison Duncan, “still a long way to go”.

The Flea was vice-chairman of the then audit and scrutiny committee when the council was “right up to the neck” only four years ago.

He said the prolific overspending by the authority four years ago risked leaving the authority with no reserves in 2017/18.

“This is a long-awaited, excellent report,” he told members.

“In June 2010 we were right into the mire, and right up to the neck. I had to sit in this building and answer some very difficult questions.

“We’ve heard today that we have moved forward steadily over the past four years.

“To read [the report] … it’s music to my ears, but we still have a long way to go.

“We still have to take very difficult decisions and stick to the medium term financial plan. But without the excellent work done by Mr Gray we maybe wouldn’t be where we are today.”

About Ryan Taylor

Ryan Taylor is a reporter at The Shetland Times

View other stories by »

8 comments

  1. Christopher Johnston

    These costs do not seem reasonable when compared with the new Kirkwall Grammar School in Orkney. KGS has an enrollment of 770 pupils and cost 58million to build, including the halls of residence. Anderson High School has an enrollment of 900 pupils and will be built for 40 million?

    Reply
    • roberta clubb

      just for the record : KGS incorporates a community theatre .

      Reply
      • Christopher Johnston

        Right you are. So perhaps this project will be completed on schedule and on budget like Mareel?

      • Ali Inkster

        Just for the record The SIC/Shetland arts said it would be impossible to incorporate a community arts facility with the high school. Where the SIC fail the OIC find a way. Could this be why they are not in the financial mire we find ourselves in. https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/shetland-islands-council-resign sign online. Or at your local shop (except for folk in Weisdale)

    • Marina Thomason

      @Christopher Johnston, the £58 million was the total amount Orkney agreed to spend on their schools investment programme. For that they got the new Kirkwall grammer school, new Papdale Halls of Residence, Orkney Arts Theatre, a new school at Stromness, a new swimming pool and extended leisure facilities at the Pickaquoy centre. OIC secured £40 million from the Scottish Government towards the costs.

      Reply
    • Bill Smale

      The cost of the Orkney School Improvement programme was reported as £57 million. This includes Stromness Primary School and the Pickaquoy Pool & Fitness facilities as well as Kirkwall Grammar School & the Papdale Hall of Residence.

      Reply
  2. John Tulloch

    From above:

    “Members heard July’s education and families committee would receive a report showing the disparity between Shetland secondary education and that of Orkney and the Western Isles.

    One contributing factor is believed to be that the SIC includes in its schools’ budget figures relating to early retirement, whereas, in Orkney, the costs are separately absorbed.”

    i.e. In Orkney, staff cuts reduce apparent education spending while in Shetland, staff cuts add to apparent education spending.

    Reply
  3. Johan Adamson

    Also, building next to Clickimin should have saved money

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others. Comments are moderated. Moderators have been instructed to approve or reject comments but not to edit them. Comments may therefore be withheld due to one incautious phrase in an otherwise acceptable contribution.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>