‘No’ vote means no advance (John Thomson)

I have just been wondering about all this nonsense from Better Together about Scotland re-applying to join the EU.

Some simple facts for people to consider:

• Scotland is at the moment part of the EU, and has been for 40 years.

• We are fully intergrated into all EU departments and systems.

• We meet all EU legal requirements.

• Why would the EU want us to leave?

• We have a major share of EU fishing grounds,and large part of EU oil reserves. Only a renegotiation of treaties are required to seperate Scotland from the rest of the UK,( the rest of the UK would also need to renegotiate their treaties).

• The EU actually has no system by which it can expel an existing member.

Shetlanders should be looking to having the same status as the Åland Islands.

With a “yes” vote Shetland can negotiate special status within their nation states and within the EU. A “no” vote means no advance for Shetland.

With a “yes” vote, in Scotland’s accession treaty negotiations Shetland can get specific provision with other island groups to be at the top table during EU decision  making.

Listen to Jean Didier Hache at http://mixlr.com/islands2014/showreel/islands2014-fri-20-sep-2014-morning-session-part-2-of-2/

I feel the scaremongerers are trying too hard to make a case out of nothing. Some sensible negotiations would sort all this out before our independence date in 2016.

John Thomson
25 Haldane Burgess Crescent,
Lerwick.

8 comments

  1. Gordon Harmer

    Are you sure it you that’s been wondering John or am I suffering from de-ja vu, you guys are so desperate you are copying each others letters word for word. So as well as no answers you have no original thoughts.

    Reply
    • Brian Nugent

      Gordon, you are right about one thing, this is getting like deja vue, Brian

      Reply
  2. Gordon Harmer

    Harry Potter, fiction fantasy containing a ministry of magic who’s function is to tell the wizards what to think do and say.

    SNP independence campaign, fiction fantasy containing a ministry of wondering, who’s function is to tell the campaigners what to think say and do.

    Reply
    • john thomson

      once again you are suffering from deja vu. you are still spouting about snp telling yes voters what to say. i am not a member of snp, and am looking forward to voting for a fairer govnment after our independence day

      Reply
      • Gordon Harmer

        If you are not being told what to say why this ? A copy of Brian Nugent’s letter posted on the same day as yours, the same grammar and spelling mistakes, word for word copied and pasted from letters that have been aired on more than this web site throughout Scotland. Grass roots campaign; this is the SNP who run the Yes campaign with tax payers money. Nothing fair or fairer about big brother Salmond telling folk who are claiming to be grass roots supporters what to write. Some coincidence that you and Brian just happened to be wondering about the same thing at the same time.

        “I have just been wondering about all this nonsense from Better Together about Scotland re-applying to join the EU.

        Some simple facts for people to consider:

        Scotland is at the moment part of the EU, and has been for 40 years.

        We are fully intergrated into all EU departments and systems.

        We meet all EU legal requirements.

        Why would the EU want us to leave?

        We have a major share of EU fishing grounds,and large part of EU oil reserves. Only a renegotiation of treaties are required to seperate Scotland from the rest of the UK, (the rest of the UK would also need to renegotiate their treaties).

        The EU actually has no system by which it can expel an existing member.

        Shetlanders should be looking to having the same status as the Åland Islands. With a yes vote Shetland can negotiate special status within their nation states and within the EU. A no vote means no advance for Shetland.

        With a Yes vote, in Scotland’s accession treaty negotiations Shetland can get specific provision with other island groups to be at the top table during EU decision making.

        Listen to Jean Didier Hache at http://mixlr.com/islands2014/showreel/islands2014-fri-20-sep-2014-morning-session-part-2-of-2/

        I feel the scaremongerers are trying too hard to make a case out of nothing. Some sensible negotiations would sort all this out before our independence date in 2016.

        Brian Nugent
        Chair
        Yes Shetland”

      • Brian Smith

        When George Jacobson and his Tory colleagues from the No campaign sent in a communique written by David Cameron, Gordon Harmer made no complaint.

  3. Gordon Harmer

    That Brian, is because he only sent it in once and did not start it by saying “I have just been wondering about” thereby insinuating they were his thoughts. You can try as hard as you want to defend it but it is indisputable proof this campaign is being led by and is all about the SNP when the Chair of Yes Shetland is told what to write on local web sites. Just to correct you the No campaign is a multiparty campaign not a Tory campaign, this may be difficult for you to understand as someone who changes his party allegiance when a favourable bandwagon come along.

    Reply
    • Brian Smith

      O goodness, whit party am I joined noo.

      Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>