22nd August 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

North parents urge councillors to listen

3 comments, , by , in Headlines, News
Parent council members and pupils protest about the proposed closure of Urafirth Primary School.

Parent council members and pupils protest about the proposed closure of Urafirth Primary School.

Urafirth Parent Council is urging Shetland Island Council to throw out proposals to close their successful primary school when they meet in early November.

Chairwoman Claire Herridge said the entire community had been shocked by the experience of being part of the council’s education budget saving exercise and despite a protracted consultation, the resulting document left people feeling they had not been listened to.

Even though the document was extremely long, complex and hard to digest, it still did not contain all the responses that the council had received and had not addressed all of the concerns.

Ms Herridge said: “We consider it has come up with misleading conclusions and as a result we have lost all confidence in this process.

“Most significantly, it has not taken into account the upsurge in the local economy, the arrival of many young families in the area and the resulting projected increase in the school roll, which we expect to triple within the next five years on current birth rates alone.”

Another major concern is the travel times for young children from outlying areas if they are forced to attend Ollaberry Primary School.

Ms Herridge said: “The pick-up points are inconvenient and unsafe, and reaching them will take a long time for some children whether they walk, get a lift or catch a feeder service, all of which will take many beyond the maximum 40-minute travel time.

“Furthermore Ollaberry is currently unable to cope with the amount of traffic the proposal will generate, nor the number of pupils attending the school itself.

“In order to cope with the increased numbers Ollaberry Primary School would have to be extended, and more parking space would impinge on the school’s recreational area.

“This would all cost the council a considerable sum, when we all know the whole purpose of this exercise is to save money. ”

Ms Herridge said Urafirth was a fantastic purpose-built school that provided a first class education for the growing number of children in the community.

She added: “We are horrified at the council’s proposal to close such a tremendous facility at a time when we are seeing young families moving into the area bringing prosperity back to this remote part of Shetland.

“The education department’s proposal to close Urafirth and North Roe primary schools is misguided and the consultation process has not taken into account our serious concerns.

“We urge councillors to support our remote rural communities by keeping our schools open, rather than undermining us at a time when we are getting back on our feet again.

“The money the council will save will be insignificant in comparison to the damage that will be done to this area.

“Rather than taking this destructive approach, we would be willing to engage in constructive talks with the council about how it could find efficiencies within its education budget without threatening the wellbeing of rural Shetland.”

About Jim Tait

Jim Tait is news editor at The Shetland Times.

View other stories by »

3 comments

  1. John Tulloch

    North Roe primary school is the one that is under threat. The SIC always close half of what they say they want to close.

    Last time Uyeasound and Burravoe went and North Roe and Sandness were “saved” – “saved” for the “next slice”.

    It is absolutely essential that the CURE communities stick together and fight EVERY closure, tooth and nail. Why?

    Look at the SIC’s track record, if they get this one, they’ll be back in a year or two for further “slices” and like North Roe, this time around, YOUR SCHOOL COULD BE NEXT!

    Schools are the heart and soul of rural communities and no school should ever be closed for accounting dogma.

    Solidarity is they key.

    Reply
  2. John Tulloch

    The fact that this damaging programme of rural school closures is continuing, unabashed, in the wake of the SIC’s two main arguments for closure, namely, the false claims that Shetland’s cost per pupil is 40 percent higher than Orkney and the Western Isles and that Education Scotland had stated that the junior high schools were “no longer viable” for delivering the so-called “Curriculum for Excellence”, is extraordinary.

    Within a fortnight of this egregious ST “Sounding Off” piece by the education committee chair Vaila Wishart, the claims were completely debunked.

    Yet, amazingly, there have been no explanations, no apologies, no resignations and the closure programme continues on its odious, misguided way,mas if nothing has happenened!

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.