18th September 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Hotel project thrown out by planners

3 comments, , by , in Headlines, News

Plans for a new hotel in Brae have been thrown out by Shetland Islands Council over fears future housing provision may be lost.

The 120- bed development, with a new access road and associated car parking and footpaths, was proposed for south of Roebrek last year as a way of providing accommodation for BP workers.

However, the SIC’s planning department has rejected the plans following concerns the development was to be built on a site suitable for much-needed housing.

North Mainland councillor Alastair Cooper last year insisted a project to build two-bedroom houses would have left a better “legacy” to the isles.

BP says it is now reviewing its accommodation requirements for shift workers at Sullom involved in the terminal refurbishment and the new gas sweetening plant.

A document within the council’s planning pages said: “The key concern is that the proposed use for a hotel is to be located on a site with development potential that has been identified in Shetland Local Development Plan (2014) as being specifically for future housing provision.

“Hence any alternative use proposed for this site may therefore compromise the planning authority’s ability to provide adequate housing in this area in future and, as a result, set an undesirable precedent.”

BP spokesman Stephen Christie said: “Given the current business conditions being faced by our industry… we are reviewing our accommodation requirements for shift workers at SVT.

“As a result, the decision has been taken not to proceed with the hotel occupancy agreement at this time. We are now reviewing all of the available alternative accommodation options. We remain committed to having a rotational workforce comprising domiciled and non-domiciled employees at SVT, and to engaging with staff on alternative accommodation options as soon as possible.”

BP was previously keen on having a hotel, because it was seen as a way of assisting with changes in shift patterns among technicians and engineers from a five-day week to a rotational system of two weeks on and three weeks off.

Applicant for the project was Gove Developments Ltd of Newall Road, Hounslow. BP had an occupancy agreement for the hotel, but was not the developer nor responsible for the planning application process.

• See this week’s Shetland Times for more details.

About Ryan Taylor

Ryan Taylor has worked as a reporter since 1995, and has been at The Shetland Times since 2007, covering a wide variety of news topics. Before then he reported for other newspapers in the Highlands, where he was raised, and in Fife, where he began his career with DC Thomson. He also has experience in broadcast journalism with Grampian Television. He has lived in Shetland since 2002, where he harbours an unhealthy interest in old cars and motorbikes.

View other stories by »

3 comments

  1. John Tulloch

    500 million barrels of oil at $50/barrel = $25 billion.

    $5 billion to BP? $20 billion to the UK Treasury?

    Here come the “crumbs from the table” for Shetland.

    Reply
    • Robin Stevenson

      Get over it John, that’s a drop in the ocean [if you pardon the pun] in comparison, membership of the UK for only the last 32 years has left Scotland anywhere from £180 billion to £250 billion worse off than it would have been as an independent country. Thanks to Westminster we’re £1.6 Trillion in debt, where we should have been sitting here with an oil fund every bit as big as Norways.

      Read and weep: 🙁

      http://barentsobserver.com/en/business/2015/03/oil-fund-makes-every-norwegian-paper-millionaires-17-03

      Reply
      • Ali Inkster

        Norways national debt is as big as its oil fund wrobin, and the oil fund divided up between all the population would give them roughly £180,000 each. not quite the millionaires you claim.

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.