25th April 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Holyrood’s ‘top-down, centralising approach’ to education comes under fire

By RYAN TAYLOR

A planned review of governance in education has come under heavy fire today by members of the SIC’s education and families committee.

The Scottish government in Holyrood was compared with a right-wing Westminster Tory government by one of the committee’s religious representatives, while another member slammed the SNP administration for its “top-down, centralising approach”.

Members had been asked to give feedback to the proposals, drawn up in Holyrood, which aim to hand more power to head teachers.

Draft responses had been drawn up to a list of 17 questions. But at this morning’s meeting the plans were criticised for failing to allow teachers to get on and teach.

Members agreed to beef up some of the answers to the questions and provide a response for Edinburgh which is more “politically-based”.

It follows concerns raised last week by Hayfield House officials that Scottish government plans to give more autonomy to schools risk placing a bureaucratic burden on teachers and education staff. (See last week’s Shetland Times).

Let’s tell the Scottish government it’s their top-down, centralising approach that gives us the most difficulty. GARY ROBINSON

The prospect of new regional boards has also raised hopes that “island-proofing” measures could be introduced for the isles.

Shetland Central member Davie Sandison set the ball rolling, and wondered whether some of the wording could be “much stronger”.

Political leader Gary Robinson said members had the opportunity to express their views forcefully.

“Let’s not hold back. Let’s tell the Scottish government it’s their top-down, centralising approach that gives us the most difficulty,” he said.

George Smith: "Unless we take some swift action we might not have a Shetland College or and NAFC either."

George Smith called for a “much more politically-influence” response.

Committee vice-chairman George Smith said there was a strong need to recognise Shetland’s “particular circumstances”, which he said were very different from what might be found in the central belt.

Mr Smith said the SIC had shown real commitment to education, but voiced concerns that the local authority risked being “squeezed” if plans to create regional boards go ahead.

“There is a real need for us to use this [response] as a basis for strengthening our position with a much more politically-influenced response,” he told members, although he stressed he was not criticising staff for wording the responses in the way they had.

“We have been, for the lifetime of this council, stressing the need for island-proofing. We need recognition by the Scottish government that, by our very nature, we’re different from other areas and we can’t have a one-size-fits-all approach to this.”

Religious representative Martin Tregonning warned schools should not be run as “mini-businesses”. He drew parallels between the “supposedly” left-wing SNP administration in Edinburgh and a right-wing Tory government in London.

He also drew on his previous experience as a governor of a state-run school in England, which had devolved authority, and warned of a situation where head teachers were taken away from the teaching environment.

“We had head teachers spending huge amounts of time discussing the electricity contract for the school, and how to save money.

“One of the benefits of the way Scottish education is structured – in Shetland in particular – is that the job of teachers is to teach, and not to be administrators.

“The best feature of the Shetland education system is that we free up our teachers and head teachers to teach, and we don’t ask them to run schools as mini-businesses”.

He said he was “very surprised” by the approach from a “supposedly left-leaning Scottish government”.

“This is something I’d expect from a Conservative government minister in England.”

Criticism has been levelled at the wording of the questions.

Religious member Tom McIntyre gained support after asking whether there was scope for an “additional statement” over and above the standard responses to the consultation.

Director of Children’s Services, Helen Budge, said some national bodies had not answered the questions at all, but had merely put in statements in response.

About Ryan Taylor

Ryan Taylor has worked as a reporter since 1995, and has been at The Shetland Times since 2007, covering a wide variety of news topics. Before then he reported for other newspapers in the Highlands, where he was raised, and in Fife, where he began his career with DC Thomson. He also has experience in broadcast journalism with Grampian Television. He has lived in Shetland since 2002, where he harbours an unhealthy interest in old cars and motorbikes.

View other stories by »

4 comments

  1. John Tulloch

    “Let’s not hold back. Let’s tell the Scottish government it’s their top-down, centralising approach that gives us the most difficulty,”

    This is quite correct and it’s why the SNP are often referred to as “Tartan Tories”. However, recalling the SIC’s schools closure plan – junior highs to be closed and pupils moved to AHS, Lerwick – we see that Mr Robinson’s reported comment is pure humbug.

    Reply
  2. Christopher Johnston

    A cousin is a retired head teacher in the UK and experienced the moving of school administrative burden onto the head teacher’s plate. The authorities increased school responsibilities and staffing needs but did not increase funding. Central office staffing and funding remained the same, but with fewer responsibilities. When she complained, she was told to keep quiet and get on with it.

    It was not conducive to education.

    Reply
  3. John Tulloch

    During the schools closure programme, opponents were told how wonderful is the so-called Curriculum for Excellence and how we must redesign our education system to fit with its requirements.

    Yet, after 10 years of SNP government and CforE we now hear that Scottish education has recorded its worst ever results in the international Pisa study.

    And proponents of the scheme wanted to close schools with better results than the AHS which pupils were to attend following closure of their junior highs.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-38207729

    Reply
  4. i tinkler

    Gary Robinson, election manifesto 2012; ““We must recognise and support the achievement of pupils and staff at Aith JHS who gained some of the best exam results in the country. I stand on my track record of supporting schools in the Shetland West ward.”
    Gary Robinson, 5th November 2014, Backs closure of most rural schools and bussing of children to Lerwick, including Sandwick and Aith !
    Gary Robinson, 05/12/2016, bleats: “Let’s tell the Scottish government it’s their top-down, centralising approach that gives us the most difficulty.”
    Is there no end to Gary’s two faced hypocrisy. Strange when a new election approaches he so sings a different tune. We will not forget Gary when it comes to voting in May.

    http://www.naija.io/blogs/p/1082527/shetland-islanders-fight-plan-to-force-children-to-boarding-school

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.