27th June 2017

Delay in decision over island games funding request

3 comments, , by , in Headlines, News

Shetland Islands Council has kicked an 11th hour £5,000 funding application for the island games into the long grass – just as competitors in the flagship event are preparing to head off to Gotland.

Councillors were asked to consider the last minute request at this morning’s policy and resources committee.

But a motion by Theo Smith to offer £10,000 on the understanding that it was a “one-off” was beaten by five votes to three, after Mark Burgess successfully argued that the application be deferred to the next full council meeting.

That came after SIC director of corporate services Christine Ferguson suggested further information may be provided at a later date.

A letter, dated 19th May, was sent to council chief executive Mark Boden from Shetland Island Games Association (Siga) chairwoman Karen Woods.

“Shetland Island Games Association has appreciated financial support from the council in the past, which contributes towards the costs of our competitors’ participation,” the letter stated.

“The last grant assistance available to Shetland Islands Games Association was in 2013. However, competitors in the Western Isles and Orkney still enjoy financial support from their respective councils.

“Whilst we understand the ongoing financial pressures int he public sector in Shetland, we would like to ask the council if they would consider supporting the Shetland team with an equivalent level of financial support given to the Western Isles and Orkney Island Games Associations.”

During the meeting head of finance Jonathan Belford said granting the funding risked leaving the council open to “reputational damage” – particularly following the SIC’s recent history where funding was withdrawn from a range of organisations.

He said the island games team was “already committed to going to Sweden”.

Mr Belford asked whether the committee would consider making a contribution in relation to travel and accommodation and – if they did  – identify where the money would come from.

Alastair Cooper raised points about funding from community councils, citing a request to Delting Community Council which had yielded support for two people.

He asked whether the SIC was being asked to provide “retrospective funding”.

Mr Belford replied: “I might choose to agree with you.” However, he said the games had not started yet and the team had not yet traveled to Sweden.

But he added: “This request is very, very late, in relation to the actual planning for the games.”

Allison Duncan said he was not opposed to supporting the games. But he voiced concern that it would “open the floodgates” for other organisations.

Stephen Leask asked whether Mr Belford had a record of the money Siga had received.

“What level of top-up are they looking for in relation to grant assistance?” he asked. He also pondered whether competitors would be “celebrating with champagne or Newcastle brown ale”.

Mr Leask later said members were looking at the “flagship of sporting events”.

“This is not just a local rugby team. It’s probably the biggest event we will see.”

However, the meeting heard Shetland had a high proportion of officials going to Gotland when compared with other island groups.

Mr Duncan pointed to figures which said Shetland had 21 coaches, managers and physiotherapists, while Orkney have 60 competitors and two officials.

“Is there any reason why we should be top-heavy?” he asked.

Mr Belford said that would be a question for the games association.

There was a sense that members were reluctant to put the brakes on support for what amounts to Shetland’s most significant sporting event.

But Theo Smith said the sum being asked was not a big one.

Mr Smith said: “I think we have to realise that this is a prestigious event. I think that we, as a council, should reflect on that. I think we, sometimes, are not very good at projecting Shetland’s image – in this case – abroad. These competitors are going to be ambassadors for Shetland.”

He added that many would be in full-time education or under 18.

Mr Cooper said the organisation had taken too long in coming with its funding request.

“We’ve kent about the island games for a long, long time,” he said.

But Ms Ferguson came forward with a suggestion to members. Stressing that she was not contributing to the debate, she said there was information which may help the decision-making process – particularly around the assistance the council would normally provide young people for their activities outwith the isles.

She said the details could not be provided today, adding it was open to the committee to defer a decision until the full council pending that further information.

Theo Smith put forward his motion that funding not exceeding £10,000 be made available. He said the money should be drawn from an underspend in the 2016/17 budget.

But Mr Burgess preferred bringing it to the full council. “I’d welcome deferment to the council for greater consideration as a community matter,” he said.

About Ryan Taylor

Ryan Taylor has worked as a reporter since 1995, and has been at The Shetland Times since 2007, covering a wide variety of news topics. Before then he reported for other newspapers in the Highlands, where he was raised, and in Fife, where he began his career with DC Thomson. He also has experience in broadcast journalism with Grampian Television. He has lived in Shetland since 2002, where he harbours an unhealthy interest in old cars and motorbikes.

View other stories by »

3 comments

  1. James Soper

    It is great to see that the Shetland Island Games Association (SIGA) has responded to the concerns of participants about the cost of representing Shetland at the 2017 Games and approached the SIC for funding.

    However, I have to agree with the council that applying for funding 1 month before the Games is “very, very late in relation to the actual planning of the Games.”

    All discussions about funding should now be for Gibraltar in 2019.

    It would not be fair to all those who were selected to represent Shetland in Gotland 2017 but had to make the heartbreaking decision to withdraw because of the advertised cost only for that cost to be reduced at the last minute and for them not to have the opportunity to attend the Games.

    Unlike many other Island Games associations SIGA do not have a representative responsible for fundraising. SIGA’s website lists just one sponsor for these 2017 Games. When this is compared to, for instance, the Western Isles who list 9 sponsors on their website (http://www.wiiga.com/sponsors.htm) fundraising certainly looks like an area where SIGA can improve in the future.

    Reply
  2. Stuart Paton

    Why is the additional grant funding not coming from the Shetland Charitable Trust ?

    The Shetland Charitable Trust is a charity set up to benefit the people of Shetland, especially in the areas of:

    – Social care and welfare

    – Arts, culture, sport and recreation

    – The environment, natural history and heritage.

    Whose coffers recently increased by 32 million pounds ?

    http://www.shetnews.co.uk/news/14770-trump-helps-boost-trust-funds

    Reply
    • Michael Garriock

      Wheesh, the SCT need all they have, they have a Scot’s Govt. pie-in-the-sky pipe dream windfarm to pay for.

      Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.