Letter from Westminster

The House of Commons witnessed a small piece of history last week when Nick Clegg stood at the des­patch box in the chamber and ans­wered questions at Prime Minister’s Question Time. David Cameron was in the United States so Nick was standing in for the half hour in the weekly bear pit that is PMQ.

How did he do? Well, I may be a less than impartial observer but I thought he did pretty well. His answers were pretty crisp and to the point. On the other side of the table he was facing Jack Straw – a sea­son­ed Commons performer but someone whose style is better suited to a long and perhaps legalistic debate rather than the cut and thrust of question time.

Curiously the one point that jour­nalists and opposition MPs picked up on was his reference to the war in Iraq as being “illegal”. Pressed later the Downing Street press office ex­plained that this was a personal opin­ion. Does it matter whether it is a personal opinion or not? In my personal opinion it does not. More than that, in my personal opinion he was right!

The war in Iraq was like no other that this country has ever fought. There was no territorial incursion as there had been in the first Gulf War when Kuwait had been invaded. To be legal, therefore, Tony Blair and his cabinet had to demonstrate that there was some real and imminent danger caused to us or some ally by the former Iraqi regime. International law is clear that invading another country just to change its government is not legal. In the United States the govern­ment of George Bush never preten­ded that the war was about anything other than removing Sadam from power. Their concern about the niceties of international law was less than obvious.

It tells you something about the atmosphere in the House of Com­mons at the present time that Labour MPs started touring the radio and television studios to express their somewhat synthetic astonishment at this “gaff”. If I were a Labour MP then I would think the less I did to draw attention to the legality of the Iraq war the better it would be. Had they been prepared to talk about the legality before the war then it might have been academic now.

The House of Commons has now risen for the summer recess. We shall not, however, be away from West­minster for the next three months as has been the case in years gone by. We shall instead be away for the month of August only and back at the beginning of September for two weeks and then off again for the three weeks of the party con­fer­ence season. It has not been univer­sally well received among MPs but in opposition I always believed it was bad for parliament for it not to sit for the best part of three months. It was far too long for the business of government to go without scrutiny so we changed it in government. Not as dramatic as a Liberal Democrat answering questions at PMQ but a small piece of parliamentary history nevertheless.

Alistair Carmichael MP


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.