10th December 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

More people now in favour of windfarm than against it, according to latest poll

3 comments, , by , in News

Click on image to enlarge.

More people living in Shetland now support Viking Energy’s controver­sial windfarm than oppose it, accord­ing to the results of the latest Shetland Times poll.

Thirty-six per cent of those asked are in favour of the 127-turbine pro­ject while 33 per cent are against and the remaining 31 per cent are un­decided. That represents an increase of five per cent in support since the original poll carried out last summer, a 15 per cent fall in opposition and a 10 per cent rise in those who are not sure one way or the other.

Many more men support the project than are against it, but among women the position is reversed, with a greater number opposed than in favour.

Among the different age groups, young people, especially those bet­ween 25 and 34, are strongly in favour but in all four age groups between the ages of 45 and 74 more people are opposed than are in support. Among those over the age of 75 questioned, more are in support than against. Geographically, sup­port is strongest in Whalsay and Skerries and the North Isles and weak­est in those areas where turbines are to be located.

Our findings come as councillors prepare to meet to consider the dev­elopment on Tuesday. In a report published yesterday afternoon (see separate story), the SIC’s planning department recom­mends that councillors should object to it.

While planners believe the dev­elopment of a windfarm of “signi­ficant scale” could comply with its development plan, Viking “has not demonstrated that this development could be undertaken without un­acceptable environmental impact”.

The Scottish government’s energy consents unit will have the final say on whether to grant plan­ning permission. It may also choose to stage a public inquiry.

In a statement, SIC convener Sandy Cluness urged councillors to carefully consider the report and its implications. “I would urge all coun­cillors to read the report carefully and weigh up the fundamental issue in its conclusion: do the economic benefits of the windfarm outweigh the environmental impact?

“The report stresses that the pros­pective economic and social benefits of the windfarm are not part of this planning report, but must be weighed up politically. That is what the council must now do.”

Our telephone poll of 1,050 people was carried out by staff mem­ber Michelle Robertson. Last year’s poll asked four supplementary ques­tions, but this time we decided to con­centrate on opinion on the prin­ciple of the windfarm.

The question – “Are you in favour of or against the proposed Viking Energy windfarm?” – was exactly the same as that asked last year. The question and methodology were designed in accordance with tech­niques used by professional pollsters and approved by BBC opinion polling expert and Strathclyde University professor John Curtice.

The random sample was weighted for age, sex and population distribu­tion to give as accurate as possible an indication of the balance of opin­ion. There is a standard margin of error of plus or minus three per cent.

The headline figure masks mark­ed variations in the balance of opin­ion between the sexes, among the different age groups and among people living in different parts of Shetland.

While overall 36 per cent of those questioned are in favour, 33 per cent against and 31 per cent undecided, among men 43 per cent are in favour (up 10 per cent from last year), 30 per cent against (down 16 per cent) and 27 per cent undecided (up 7 per cent). Among women just 29 per cent are in favour (no change), 37 per cent against (down 12 per cent) and 34 per cent undecided (up 12 per cent).

In the 16-24 age group 34 per cent are in favour (down 18 per cent), 30 per cent against (up 2 per cent) and 36 per cent undecided (up 16 per cent). Among 25-34 year olds 43 per cent are in favour (up 10 per cent), 21 per cent against (down 25 per cent) and 36 per cent undecided (up 15 per cent). In the 35-44 age group 35 per cent are in favour (up 7 per cent), 31 per cent against (down 14 per cent) and 34 per cent undecided (up 8 per cent).

Thirty-three per cent of those aged between 45 and 54 are in favour of the windfarm (up 1 per cent), 42 per cent against (down 3 per cent) and 25 per cent undecided (up 2 per cent). Among 55-64 year olds 38 per cent are in favour (up 7 per cent), 39 per cent against (down 15 per cent) and 23 per cent undecided (up 8 per cent). In the 65-74 age group, 27 per cent are in favour (up 7 per cent), 38 per cent against (down 23 per cent) and 35 per cent undecided (up 16 per cent). Finally, among those over 75, 39 per cent are in favour (up 18 per cent), 31 per cent against (down 26 per cent) and 30 per cent undecided (up 8 per cent).

Geographically, the strongest support for the windfarm is to be found in Whalsay, Skerries and the North Isles. Forty-seven per cent of those questioned in these areas (Area 1) are in favour of the windfarm, 17 per cent against and 36 per cent undecided.

In Area 2 – Voe, Mossbank, Terminal, Brae, Sullom, Muckle Roe, Burraland and North Northmaven – 35 per cent are in favour, 39 per cent against and 26 per cent undecided. In Area 3, which includes Whiteness and Weisdale and Nesting and Lunnasting and would be at the heart of the windfarm, 31 per cent are in favour, 44 per cent against and 25 per cent undecided.

In Area 4 – which includes Skeld, Aith, Bixter and Tresta – just 29 per cent are in favour, 45 per cent against and 26 per cent undecided. One half of Lerwick – Sound, Outskirts, Twageos and Sletts – and Bressay (Area 5) is in favour by a margin of 41 per cent to 28 per cent with 31 per cent undecided, while the other (Area 6 – Breiwick, Clickimin, Harbour, South Central, North Central and North) is against: 30 per cent for, 32 per cent against and 38 per cent undecided.

Among people living in Burra, Trondra, Foula, Quarff, Gulberwick and Scalloway (Area 7) 34 per cent are in favour, 36 per cent against and 30 per cent undecided. Finally, those in Dunrossness, Fair Isle, Levenwick, Bigton, Hoswick, Sandwick, Cunningsburgh and Wester Quarff are evenly split, with 35 per cent in favour, 35 per cent against and 30 per cent undecided.

Tags:

3 comments

  1. Stuart Stenhouse

    Further to the plethora of statistics of percentage support up and down, age group differentials, carbon foot-print disadvantages versus gains; the reality is this albeit vitally important subject has been milked beyond comprehension; in the ‘wind farm debate’.

    In common with the ‘serious’ issues placed before the Council Chamber; they whom sit on high are either incapable, ill-informed or utterly paralysed in their collective process to make a decision. The result of which is yet another matter removed from their hands, and sent south to Holyrood.

    Pro or Anti Windfarm will agree with the hypothesis; as long as the same narrow, self preserving minds juggle impadently their so called ‘duties’; Shetland will suffer.

    Pro or Anti Windfarm is irrelevant – the Scottish Government is committed to a huge percentage of energy sourced via natural resources. So in short, the decision has been made in Edinburgh long since.

    If we don’t change the shape, form and content of the Chamber; we will see all ‘our’ decisions, and the oil fund controlled from south.

    Last wake-up call folks.

    And lets not criticise our Civil Servants from south for their inevitable actions. We are sat on vast volumes of never ending natural energy, and a pot of money to boot.

    This wee ‘skitter’ of land can have Holyrood making concessions to us, if only the ‘skitters’ within the chamber possessed sufficient backbone to make Shetland count.

    As the chamber cannot decide what day of the week it is, little wonder the issue of the day goes on, and on and on within Shetland.

    Too much coverage from the press, too little action within the chamber. Split minds, allegiances and personal gain. Too little thought to the bigger picture.

    It is all too late, because “when you have them by the ball’s, their hearts and minds will follow”. Remember the Accounts Commission? Recommendations over charitable donations? You crowd are going to lose us and future generations the present and forthcoming generations wealth to Holyrood. And you, the chamber should have those words resonating in your heads for evermore.

    Reply
  2. “Don’t knows” have increased. Have Viking Energy and their “top” PR companies – Platform 1, Weber Shandwick and others – failed in their attempts to “inform the public” about the project? Certainly looks like it.
    If Viking Energy and the Windfarm Supporters Group have confidence in the Times poll, will they now be joining with our MSP and ourselves in welcoming a proper postal ballot on the windfarm?

    Reply
  3. Kathy Greaves

    Disraeli, being a shrewd politician, is attributed to have quoted ‘there are lies – damn lies – and statistics. Until there is a full referendum on the giant wind farm amongst the people of Shetland, numbers for, against or don’t knows, can be juggled and guessed at from now until doomsday.

    Councillors, it is over to you.

    Kathy Greaves
    Lerwick

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.