Security procedures

I reply to the letter from John Tulloch (14th February), the tone of which is unfair and one-sided, which I am sure was not his intention. However, we would like you to take the following into account with regard to security procedures.

Sumburgh, like all UK airports, follows strict security procedures, as detailed to HIAL by the department for transport (DfT). The guidelines that the DfT has issued regarding security are prescriptive and allow only a very narrow degree of interpretation, but are there for the safety of airline passengers.

They are designed this way to: 1 Protect the airport from attacks and crime; 2 Protect the aircraft from attack; and 3 Re-assure the travelling public that they are safe.

All Sumburgh airport managers and security staff have been trained to a DfT standard and they must follow that standard which, incidentally, is routinely audited by the DfT.

The current rules do not allow us to discriminate between flyer frequency, job title, or race. A body search can be triggered if the archway metal detector is triggered by something on the individual or if it is a random search. In both cases current law dictates that shoes must be removed if that area is highlighted or if the search is random. Waist belts are required to be removed as standard practice.

When making reference to small airports’ security procedures, it might be well to remember that these procedures are in place throughout all airports, regardless of size, and for good reason. This is due to the fact that prior to the 9/11 bombings in New York, the terrorists had previously passed through airports which are not dissimilar in size to our own island airports.

We would like to re-iterate that these measures are in place for your own safety and for the safety of our staff, and would like to thank our staff for their continued and dedicated attitude to this, and for the provision of a professional service.

Carole Laignel
Assistant manager
Sumburgh Airport,


Add Your Comment
  • Simon Barr

    • February 23rd, 2011 22:37

    All well and good, but perhaps HIAL may then see fit put a complete security fence around the runway rather than having a partial one with several gaps?


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.