Dictatorial behaviour (Jonathan Wills)

I see someone has been talking to one of Rupert Murdoch’s comics about an ironical gesture I made at a recent secret council meeting, in protest at the dictatorial behaviour of the chair, vice-convener Josie Simpson. Mr Simpson does not appreciate irony, so my protest backfired. Of course, I immediately apologised for any offence caused, but the public may like to know how the problem came about.

As chair of the meeting and leader of the council, Mr Simpson had allowed an official to bring forward “as a matter of urgency” a proposal that the council should spend up to £200,000 on buying a residential property – specifically to accommodate visiting consultants.

This was a particularly outrageous suggestion at a time when we have a serious housing shortage and the worst financial crisis the council has ever faced. I therefore moved a resolution that we should not enter negotiations to buy the property. It is normal procedure in any democratic assembly, be it a council, a parliament, or the annual general meeting of a budgie club, for the mover of a resolution to speak first, outlining the main points of his or her argument. The mover of any amendment or counter-proposal then gets to explain why he or she thinks the resolution is mistaken. After that, when everyone knows what are the issues and the arguments for and against, the debate is opened to all. At the end of the debate the mover of the amendment sums up, followed by the mover of the resolution, and then the matter is put to the vote. That’s how it’s always been – until this council hired a consultant who thought he knew a better way.

In recent months, the convener, the chair of education and now the vice-convener have seen fit to overturn this normal, traditional democratic procedure, which every Shetland council has followed since the beginning of public democracy in these islands in the 19th century. This is the third occasion when I’ve been prevented from making a speech to introduce a resolution that I had proposed. Each time the chairs told me that it was their prerogative to say who should speak and when. Mr Simpson told me he could run the meeting as he chose. All of them appear to be under the impression that the council’s new standing orders give them the power to overturn the usual rules of debate. They are mistaken. I will continue to protest if they act in this dictatorial manner. I will also continue to oppose absurd measures such as the proposed house purchase, which a majority of 12 members supported at last week’s meeting. No wonder they wanted to keep it secret.

Jonathan Wills
Town Hall,


Add Your Comment
  • Alan Skinner

    • August 3rd, 2011 0:17

    It is quite astonishing that, at a time when Shetland is in desperate need of of leadership, our elected representatives seem determined to find ways to make themselves look even more unprofessional and ludicrous.
    Please take a serious look at yourselves, discuss how you want to be perceived, agree a code of behaviour, agree a vision for the future, agree a strategy and an action plan, and act for the future benefit of all of Shetland.

  • Ron Stronach

    • August 3rd, 2011 12:30

    Wise words Mr. Skinner

  • Margaret Goodlad

    • August 4th, 2011 18:53

    Wise words indeed, but it is only fair to remind everyone that the majority of councilors are professional in their actions. The code of conduct is known to all, procedures for meetings have been set out for many years.

    This whole incident has been caused, similarly to the majority of such incidents, by one man, Jonathan WIlls. His inability to grasp even the basics in how to behave as an elected member of the council has never been clearer. He has continually embarrassed the council, and Shetland as a whole, since taking his position, never mind the hundreds and thousands of pounds he has cost US.

    Removing him from the town hall will go a long way accomplish what mr Skinner rightly suggests.

  • Les Lowes

    • August 6th, 2011 16:27

    However bad the notion is to purchase strategic property that might be used as accomodatioin for consultants, it pales into insignificance compared with your chosen method of protest, Jonathan.. Your action has grossly offended a great many people in this community and will not be forgotten – no matter how hard you attempt to divert attention from it. You may or may not have apologised to your fellow councillors when you “withdrew” your remarks, but it is to the Shetland electorate that you owe an apology for behaving so appallingly in our council chamber. You should apologise, or resign.

  • Iain Adam

    • August 16th, 2011 17:12

    Mr Simpson should think again


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.