Conservation group’s vessel leaves for Faroe after £520,000 is raised in security

The Steve Irwin leaving Lerwick Harbour this morning.

The Sea Shepherd Conservation society’s flagship vessel Steve Irwin has finally left Lerwick, almost three weeks later than intended, after £520,000 was raised in security for her to be released from the harbour following legal action by a Maltese aquaculture firm.

The Steve Irwin left this morning having raised over US$735,000 (over £450,000) from supporters in less than a fortnight, allowing the vessel and its crew to head for Faroe to continue its direct action campaign against the annual “Grind”, a local tradition where pilot whales are slaughtered. One of its other vessels, the Brigitte Bardot, has already begun defending the pilot whales.

The boat had been detained in Lerwick on 15th July after aquaculture firm Fish & Fish raised an action at the High Court in England seeking €760,000 (around £680,000) in damages after claiming it lost around 600 valuable bluefin tuna when divers from the Steve Irwin tore open netting and released the fish into the sea last year. It has been moored at Heogan in Bressay for the past fortnight.

A court date has not been set for the civil case, but Sea Shepherd said it was ready to battle with the company, which it said was trying to “intimidate” the campaigners and “hoping to cripple us financially, and thus reduce our ability to oppose tuna poaching in the Mediterranean”.

Thanking everyone who had donated to the cause, Captain Paul Watson said: “There is no court, no corporation, and no government on earth that will convince us that it is wrong to prevent the extinction of these fish. The economics of extinction is what we are fighting. Diminishment drives up prices and as the populations of fish in the oceans plummet, the price of frozen fish in the warehouses increases and this, the most expensive fish in the world will become even more expensive.

“With extinction, the frozen corpses become priceless. This is greed at the height of depravity, showing no respect for nature or regard to future generations, and we will not stand by and allow the bluefin to slip into the oblivion of biological extinction. Whatever the cost, whatever the risk, we intend to defend the bluefin tuna.

“We are in a war to save the oceans from ourselves. And if we lose, we all lose because if the oceans die, we all die – it’s as simple as that.”

Fish & Fish claimed it was authorised to operate a fish farm for bluefin tuna by the International Conference for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and bought live fish caught in the authorised fishery in the Mediterranean and transported them to the farm in floating cages.

It claims that on 17th June last year bluefin tuna were being taken from Libyan waters to Malta when the Steve Irwin arrived at the cages. It alleges the former fishery patrol vessel Westra rammed one of the cages.

It also maintains that bottles were thrown at crew members involved in the fish transportation and a diver was shot at with a rubber bullet, before the nets were torn allowing the fish to escape.

Following the decision to arrest the Steve Irwin Sea Shepherd UK sought to have the order recalled but the move was rejected last week by Lord Emslie. Earlier this week Lady Stacey said it could succeed if the £520,000 security was provided.

In his decision the judge said: “This was a wholly extraordinary event. It involved a deliberate physical attack on the high seas.

“A cage was rammed. Divers went down and nets were cut, allowing tuna to escape. A rubber bullet was fired and liquid-filled bottles thrown. From start to finish, the impression is one of concerted offensive action over a short timescale.”

The judge added: “A key Sea Shepherd campaign at present is to pursue and expose those responsible for illegal fishing practices by which the bluefin tuna is allegedly threatened with extinction worldwide.”

He said the Steve Irwin appeared to be one of its major assets and if the damages claim brought by Fish & Fish succeeded the firm might very well be left with no means of satisfying the court order without the arrestment of the ship.

But Lord Emslie said the practical consequences of his decision might require further discussion, including the possibility of alternative security being offered.

When the case came back before Lady Stacey, Roy Martin QC, for the charity, asked her to fix security at £400,000 to release the ship from the arrestment so that it could sail. He said it had been valued at £350,000 to £400,000 and argued that the sum offered as a bond was reasonable.

Mr Martin said that if caution was fixed at £400,000 then that sum could be made available immediately providing for the release of the vessel as quickly as possible. If a higher amount was set additional funds would have to be found.

But Robert Howie QC, for Fish & Fish, maintained that “a significantly larger sum” than £400,000 should be fixed as security. Another valuation of the ship estimated it be worth £640,000.


Add Your Comment
  • John Kryton

    • August 4th, 2011 14:32

    I find it strange that an environmentalist organisation who claim to police the seas in order to protect endangered species and who are in denial of pirate or terrorist style action have a massive 77 painted on the bow of their ship. All American war ships have a similar style number on their bow, I find it strange that the Sea Shepherd should resemble a war ship in this manner. Number 77 worries me also although this organisation may say that was the year they where founded I have my doubts.
    Conspiracy theorists often imagine that the statistically inevitable occasional appearance of the number 77 in large events such as terrorist attacks hints at ‘high-level involvement of powerful white supremist, Zionist and/or Christian-based secret societies’, e.g., Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on September 11, or the infamous 7 July 2005 London bombings, also known as 7/7. Theorists purport that the appearance of the number 77 in other aspects of the culture is indicative of association with such groups.

  • Mr Roger moody

    • August 5th, 2011 17:43

    Since when have any wild animal ever been anyone’s property? Never as far as I know. Therefore how can this Maltese company claim for any type of loss of profits? Someone enlighten me please.The moral high ground has been won. So shut up and move on.

  • ian tinkler

    • August 8th, 2011 9:52

    Steve Irwin’s 77!!!, Just as well the Brigitte Bardot does not carry a massive a “69” painted on her bow. John Kryton and his supremacy, Zionist and/or Christian-based secret societies, conspiracy theorists would really get their knickers in a twist.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.