More in SIC earned £50,000+ than councils in Orkney and Western Isles combined

Shetland Islands Council had 131 staff members earning over £50,000 last year – more than the councils in Orkney (59) and the Western Isles (63) combined.

The disparity is largely accounted for by the fact that nearly half (61) of the SIC’s highest-paid employees were marine staff working as pilots or on the tugs and ferries. In stark contrast, nobody in the tug and ferry crews in Orkney earned more than £50,000, according to its council, while in the Western Isles the council has no large port or ferries to run.

The difference between the island groups is greater still when those on even higher pay rungs are compared. The SIC had 30 people earning over £70,000 plus pension injections in 2010/11 while Orkney Islands Council had just seven. The Western Isles, which, like the SIC, was having its own management restructuring with early retirements and redundancies, had 17.

At the very top of the SIC wage bill last year were five employees, some believed to be pilots, who pocketed over £100,000 during the first wave of golden handshakes which were agreed to cut the number of senior managers and other high earners in the local authority. They also benefited from generous final salary pension schemes. Two among that top five were paid over £130,000 while one made over £140,000.

Nobody in Orkney Islands Council earned over £100,000 last year although a consultant, Albert Tait, was hired to stand in for chief executive Alistair Buchan after he was seconded to be chief executive in Shetland and charged £103,790 for his nine months.

Two employees in the Western Isles Council earned over £100,000, both due to enhancements given for early retirement or voluntary redundancy.

The SIC did not disclose in its accounts how many of those earning over £50k did so as a one-off because they were leaving. In the Western Isles that accounted for 22 of the 63 employees in the over-£50k bracket.

The down-sizing of top management and other expensive employees in the SIC has gathered momentum in this financial year. According to the latest figures 24 of the 131 over-£50k earners from last year have since left voluntarily.

Mr Buchan said: “The fact is we are well on the way to delivering our £1million [savings] target in that area as we aim to create a much more efficient organisation.”

The SIC is now about to turn its attention to cutting a further £2 million a year from its spending from 2013/14 by renegotiating the single status pay and conditions deal which added an extra £4.5 million to the annual wage bill.

The 131 employees in the over-£50k bracket in Shetland included 22 teachers, head teachers and principal teachers who were needed to run the 33 schools which were still open in Shetland during the last financial year – one less than in the Western Isles but 10 more than in Orkney.

Mr Buchan said it meant that, between teaching and marine jobs, over 60 per cent of the best-paid jobs in the local authority were in “frontline services” rather than office jobs.

However, the upper echelons of the SIC would have been more bloated still if it was not for the helping hand provided by Shetland Charitable Trust in paying for some services. Unlike the two other island authorities, the SIC does not have to fund a number of top managers in charge of sport and recreation, culture, heritage and the arts in Shetland. Their costs were farmed out to the trust which provides most of the money to operate the Shetland Recreational Trust, Shetland Amenity Trust and Shetland Arts.

Inside the council’s 11-strong corporate management team the biggest beneficiary last year was the head of finance himself, Graham Johnston, who left on 31st March with £175,938, comprising his £74,535 salary and expenses, a £27,075 “compensation” lump sum for retiring early and entitlement to a pension lump sum of £74,328 from his pension scheme. His departure was described as an “efficiency retirement”.

Mr Buchan was unusually expensive for an SIC chief executive at £137,101 because councillors had to pay extra for taking him on loan from Orkney. He only took up his post on 5th July last year, three months into the financial year, so earned £118,279 of what would have been a full-year salary of £141,803. He also got £18,822 towards his accommodation, car and family trips. However, at his own instigation there is no pensionable element to his contract, so there will be no additional draw on the SIC pension fund.

Executive director of education and social care Hazel Sutherland earned £94,348 plus employers’ pension payments. Her salary was particularly high because it included an enhancement for acting as chief executive during the David Clark fiasco, including three months’ back pay for fulfilling that role during 2009/10.

Ms Sutherland is due to take voluntary redundancy at the end of March when she will be in line for some form of pay-off. The details of that may only be revealed when this year’s accounts are published in the summer.

The salaries and allowances paid to the eight other members of the top team ranged from £57,280 to £78,279 – well short of the £84,031 that was the norm in Orkney’s top team last year.

Until now senior managers’ remuneration has not been made publicly available. But the Accounts Commission forced local authorities to declare their earnings in last year’s accounts for the first time. In the past only the number of those earning £50,000 or more was disclosed, split into bands rising by £10,000.

Those incomes do not include payments into their final salary pension pot by the councils which, in Shetland’s case, can be worth £17,000-£30,000 a year for top managers.

Mr Buchan said the information had been available to view since September. “As a council, we want to be entirely open about earnings levels.”

The remuneration of senior employees has been disclosed publicly for the first time in the council’s annual accounts – as required under the latest accounting procedures. In addition to those mentioned above the assistant chief executive, four more heads of service and a service manager have all their pay details listed too. They formed the top management team of 10 which cost the public purse almost £1.17 million in 2010/11 before Mr Buchan began his management restructuring to slash costs.

Full details of the salaries and pensions can be seen on pages 26-33 of the Statement of Accounts 2010/11. The document is on the council’s website at


Add Your Comment
  • Douglas Young

    • February 23rd, 2012 18:41

    One thing the SIC is not short of is money. If every grandiose project counted in millions was put on hold until we could afford it, there would be no need to cut social care, grass cutting, public toilets and any other project counted in thousands.
    Get a grip as you sit round the Town Hall table. You will be respected and remembered for the money you didn’t spend.

  • John Kryton

    • February 23rd, 2012 18:59

    ‘It’s not long since the council was telling us that “the community” thinks that SIC staff terms and conditions are “generous”. It never became clear what and where this community is.

    ‘Now councillor Smith informs us that “the community [is] starting to accept the need for change” (ie. massive cuts). He has heard this encouraging news “from several quarters” (Shetland News, 10th February).

    ‘I have written to ask for details of this latest community pronouncement.’

    Brian Smith eat your words.

  • Jonathan Wills

    • February 23rd, 2012 22:08

    This further embarrassing news reinforces my argument that we should be making further cuts in administration costs before we set about pensioners’ lunch clubs. We could start by amalgamating the Chief Executive’s and “Corporate Services” departments and not appointing a “Corporate Services Director” after the imminent departure of the temporary incumbent, Mr Brian Lawrie (who has done excellent work on reorganising the council’s finances). Councillors rejected this proposal last week but it will be in my, and I hope, other candidates’ election manifestos in May. The council could agree a revised budget in June, sharing the pain of these unavoidable economies more fairly.

    Cllr. Jonathan Wills
    Lerwick South ward

  • D. Thomson

    • February 24th, 2012 10:15

    Speaking on Radio Shetland on Thursday, Councillor Angus said he could not find any documents relating to who exactly took the decision on the Bressay Brig interdict. No surprise there. It would not be difficult to imagine a scenario, following the departure of some senior council officials at the time, whereby sack-fulls of shredded documents left the Town Hall heading for Rova Head.

    There really needs to be a serious and legal investigation as to where Shetland’s millions have gone over the last ten years, particularly at big spending SIC departments like The Economic Development Unit. However it is unlikely that anything will happen other than so-called ‘senior councillors’ posturing euphemising whitewash for the umpteenth time by calling for ‘lines to be drawn’ and ‘moving on’.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.