Destructive and expensive (John Anderson)

Having witnessed the meeting in the town hall last week, I am appalled at the apparent incompetence of the Shetland Charitable Trust.

Not only did the trustees fail in their second attempt to manipulate democracy by trying to force through a paper asking for more money for Viking Energy – they had to be reminded of their own rules when it came to having enough members present to vote.

None of this comes as any surprise though. Like many others in my area (and whatever councillor Gussie Angus’s conversations with “crofters in the area” might have led him to believe), I remain horrified at Viking’s plans, and now it would appear the Scottish minister believes the people of Shetland approved wholeheartedly of the project – because the council backed it. Well, did they?

What about Sandy Cluness’ promises of a referendum? Where is our public inquiry? When will the whole community be given the chance to express their views? A phone poll by a local newspaper is not enough – the real feeling of the community was better illustrated in the number of official planning objections submitted to the ECU, with 1,114 in favour and 2,736 against. Our outgoing elected members should hang their heads in shame to think they represented us so poorly.

An election is on the way, though, so if you have concerns about this destructive, divisive, expensive and pointless project, make sure you let your candidates know. They’ll be on your doorstep, asking for your vote. You should have a few questions for them too.

John Anderson
East Burrafirth,


Add Your Comment
  • Marina Thomason

    • April 23rd, 2012 14:48

    The fact that there was more than twice as many people who wrote to the ECU objecting to it than supporting the project apparantly counts for nothing. According to Bill Manson the amazing thing is the number who wrote supporting it. Talk about spin, my washing machine doesn’t have a look in – an dat’s been goin sum wi aa dis weet waddir!


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.