Do they have the vision? (Geordie Pottinger)

I thank Andrew Halcrow for the courtesy of replying to my letter, and also thank him for his kind words in respect to my tenure as an SIC councillor and Shetland Charitable Trust trustee.

Andrew has had the good grace to admit that Sustainable Shetland does not have a viable project plan to maintain the Shetland electricity grid, post oil, and therein lies its dilemma. It seems to support smaller individual or community enterprises supplying only Shetland’s electricity needs despite the inherent difficulties, if not impossibility, of balancing such a grid.

The NINES project will allow around 30 per cent of Shetland’s grid to be supplied by intermittent renewables, but not all, and not from everybody. Isn’t it ironic, therefore, that by denying the need for an interconnector to the national grid to absorb surplus generation, providing there is spare capacity, Sustainable Shetland’s stance could be denying some Shetlanders the opportunity of generating their own electricity?

I have taken the liberty of copying, below, a couple of lines from Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Limited (SHETL) website which readers may find interesting:

“The Shetland High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) connection is planned to provide a high capacity electricity connection between the GB transmission system and renewable energy projects on Shetland, most notably the proposed windfarm being promoted by the Viking Energy Partnership (the Viking windfarm project).

“Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Limited (SHETL), as a holder of an electricity transmission licence, has statutory obligations under The Electricity Act 1989 that require it to develop this connection and deliver it if the windfarm is consented.”

Fortunately, SSE has indicated that, having gained consent, it will continue with the Viking windfarm project irrespective of the Shetland Charitable Trust remaining in partnership or not.

This means that the interconnector will come and thereby enable possible development of other sustainable energy projects throughout Shetland.

The only question that remains is if trustees have the vision to maintain their financial investment in the project and see it through to fruition. Their decision could mean the difference between the charitable trust benefiting from another industrial renaissance, as it did in the oil era, or making do with declining returns to the trust as demands on it increase.

Geordie Pottinger


Add Your Comment
  • Bert Morrison

    • May 17th, 2012 11:59

    Throughout its campaign Sustainable Shetland has pretty much expended all its possible ammunition against Shetland having a future in the renewable energy revolution. Renewable energy gives Shetland a real opportunity to go beyond oil and prosper, yet SS still cling on to one last straw – the hope that Shetlands future in renewables will be extinguished if the Shetland Charitable Trust pull out. Given that SSE have stated that they will continue with or without the SCT; is this not an indication of SSE’s (the people who are the REAL experts) confidence in the projects viability? The viability of the project should be determined by those who are EXPERT in their field (Engineers, Contracts Managers, and Accountants, etc), NOT the people who have a bias towards the project being consigned to the dustbin OR those who want it to go ahead whatever its viability. The outcome of this should be put before the Charitable Trust members for the final business decision to either proceed or not.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.