Anti-Viking group lodges petition asking for judicial review into windfarm

Sustainable Shetland has lodged a petition at the Court of Session in Edinburgh calling for a judicial review of the Scottish Government’s decision to grant consent for Viking Energy’s huge 103-turbine windfarm.

Energy minister Fergus Ewing gave his approval to the deeply divisive project in April, while late last month Shetland Charitable Trust – which has a 45 per cent stake – approved a further £6.3 million budget towards taking the windfarm to the final decision-making stage.

In a statement issued today, Sustainable Shetland said its grounds for lodging the legal challenge include the potential impact on protected species and landscape and the fact that a public local inquiry was not held.

The Court of Session confirmed that the petition had been received and an initial hearing has been fixed for 24th October, after which a judge will decide whether to sanction the judicial review.

Sustainable Shetland vice-chairman Frank Hay said funds for the expensive legal process had been raised through the organisation’s own voluntary efforts and pledges.

Mr Hay said: “We feel justified in going to the first stage of the judicial review process, and a judge will decide if there’s a case to answer.”

The group is seeking a “protective expenses order”, which would ensure it did not have to pay the other side’s legal costs.

Sustainable Shetland, which has over 800 members, believes there were too many unanswered questions resulting from Mr Ewing’s decision not to order a public local inquiry.

Such an inquiry would have been automatically triggered had the SIC objected to the project, but in December 2010 it voted 9-3 in support. Its planning department had recommended that the council should object on environmental grounds.

Viking opponents also feel that insufficient attention has been paid to the views of those living in the areas which will be most affected by the development.

Today’s statement reads in full: “Sustainable Shetland, a voluntary organisation based in Shetland, has petitioned the Court of Session in Edinburgh to judicially review the decision by Scottish ministers to grant consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the Viking windfarm on Shetland.

“The organisation is seeking a protective expenses order, and is challenging the decision by ministers on grounds including the impact on protected species and landscape and the failure to hold a public local inquiry.”

A Scottish government spokeswoman said: “Scottish ministers are considering this petition and whether to be represented at the hearing. Given that the petition is a live case before the court it would be inappropriate to comment further.”


Add Your Comment
  • Simon Barr

    • July 13th, 2012 17:42

    Last resort

  • Sandy McMillan

    • July 13th, 2012 22:00

    Well what can you say other than, well done Sustainable Shetland, we are backing you right to the hilt, we will beat them one way or the other.
    Sandy McMillan

  • ian tinkler

    • July 16th, 2012 11:55

    Just the beginning. Every House holder or Crofter within 2K of a turbine has an absolute right to take legal action against VE, many will be legal aided. Viking will need every penny it can extort from the Trustee stooges on the SCT if it is too proceed, just to cover legal costs. With the high probability of ROC subsidy cuts and now a hint of a windfall taxes on the fat cats Landlords, Lairds and utilities, Viking looks a bit lame. Bring it on boys; we could be in for interesting times.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.