Open letter (Brian Gregson, Shetland Amenity Trust)

Trustees of Shetland Amenity Trust were deeply shocked at our meeting on Wednesday this week to hear that council officials are proposing drastic cuts across a range of trust services, including a further cut of 35 per cent to the Shetland Museum and Archives budget over the next three years. While the trust is well aware of the financial difficulties faced by the council, these proposals, if implemented, would virtually close down the museum and archives services in Shetland.

Shetland Amenity Trust has a 25-year service level agreement with Shetland Islands Council. Under the terms of this agreement, the trust must provide the agreed building and facilities to house the Museum and Archives Collections and operate both services. In return, Shetland Islands Council must provide, as the contract price, the necessary revenue resources to meet the funding required for the delivery of these services. This contract was entered into as a pre-condition of the Shetland Museum and Archives project being substantially joint-funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF). At that time the HLF sought and received assurances from Shetland Islands Council that revenue funding at an appropriate level would be maintained into the future including allowance for inflation. This was confirmed by letters, reports and council minutes during late 2001; under this agreement the appropriate level of funding for 2010/11 should have been £1,185,000.

Notwithstanding this, since the first full year of operation the Museum and Archives services have been subjected to cuts each year. During the 2012/13 budgetary process a further cut of 10 per cent over two years (2012/13 and 2013/14) was imposed. Savings of nine per cent were identified and implemented for the current year with the remainder planned for 2013/14. The total level of cuts, since opening, amount to 27 per cent in real terms and the current year’s budget is now £1,035,000, already substantially below the figures promised levels to run the services.

At a meeting between Neil Grant and senior trust officers this week, he stated that he would be recommending a further 35 per cent cut over the next three years which would reduce the total funding to £681,000. If implemented this would result in at least 20 staff being made redundant and render it impossible to provide any workable or acceptable level of museum and archive services in Shetland. This would essentially turn the building into nothing more than a large storage facility.

This is completely unsustainable and flies in the face of the spirit and substance of the partnership agreements and undertakings which were made between Shetland Islands Council, Shetland Amenity Trust and the Heritage Lottery Fund. The trust agreed to take up the mantle of providing these important services on behalf of the council and the Shetland community in good faith, but the way that this is being handled and the absence of any form of consultation or negotiation is lamentable.

Trustees are convinced that neither the councillors nor the people of Shetland would support these proposals.

The Shetland Museum and Archives is the jewel in Shetland’s crown of heritage and culture. Its success is manifest. It is the top visitor attraction in Shetland with over 83,000 visitors each year and continues to draw visitors and researchers from all backgrounds and ages and is now widely recognised as a huge community asset. Almost two thirds of all Shetland schoolchildren have visited the museum this year alone.

Shetland Amenity Trust trustees are determined to take a firm stand on this issue to ensure that this magnificent success, the past investment made and its potential benefit is not lost to future generations. We hope that you agree with this view and that you will not allow these proposals to be implemented.

While this letter concentrates on the threat to the museum and archives services, Mr Grant stated that other significant areas of the trust’s work funded by the economic directorate would also be drastically cut under his proposals which, if implemented, would severely impact the trust’s services to the community and threaten at least a further 20 jobs within the trust. We will be writing to you separately on these matters in the coming weeks.

If you require any further information about the issues raised in this letter please do not hesitate to ask either myself or Jimmy Moncrieff, the trust’s general manager.

Brian Gregson
Chairman of Shetland Amenity Trust
c/o Garthspool,


Add Your Comment
  • Margret Sinclair

    • October 21st, 2012 12:53

    Having visited the Shetland Museum and making a donation of our family’s history in Western Australia as descendents of Shetlanders I am disgusted to learn that there is a possibility that the Museum will be forced to close. My husband, daughter and I spent a whole day at the Museum and found it astounding that it contained so much of Shetlands past. We learnt a great deal about the life style that our family left behind when they emigrated almost 150 years ago. We had the chance to get up close and examine the treasures of the Lewis Chessmen and also see items connected to St Ninian’s which was a wonderful experience that made our visit even more special. Please don’t dirupt a brilliant place just for the sake of saving a few pennies. What will the Isle have to show future generations. We are looking forward to spending more time there on our next visit that is if it is still open.

  • Ron Stronach

    • October 22nd, 2012 12:21

    I remember the old museum opening for the first time, I must admit as a school aged teenager at the time I was disappointed with the museum, the library was excellent, but the museum I didn’t rate.
    Visiting Shetland for the Hamefarin in 2010, I went to the new museum and was delighted by what was within. I must have been there for about 3 hours, and went back several times during that week. I found it excelent for visitors, but wasn’t too keen on the cafe after my friend and I were asked to leave as they were closing and it was only 5PM in the summer time and it was the Hamefarin, still only a minor thing.
    I was up again for Up Helly Aa in 2011 and again I spent hours in there. I cannot believe that when it opened all flags were flying, it was being hailed as such an achievement, now it could close, how rediculous. Keep it open, its a fantastic attraction.

  • Stewart Mack

    • October 23rd, 2012 11:01

    If there is a contract/ service level agreement in place here why are the Amenity Trust not taking steps to impliment its terms? Why are they sitting back and allowing the SIC to breach the agreement? It doesnt make sense to me.
    Would the Council be entitled to walk away from its contractual obligations elsewhere? I dont think so! I dont recall the Harbour Trust “letting them off” over the Bressay Bridge debacle, or indeed any of the private firms letting them away with breaches, so why should the Amenity Trust.

    Over the years, the Amenity Trust has provided an invaluable service to Shetland, mostly at the request of the SIC. It should not now be lost because the Councillors do not want to face the decisions they were elected to take.#

    Come on Shetland, and come on Amenity Trust – Dont let them away with it!!

  • Gordon Johnston

    • October 30th, 2012 22:00

    As someone who makes regular use of the Shetland Archives, I would like to voice my support of Brian Gregson. The people who are employed there work very hard indeed to encourage research into Shetland’s past, and never fail to find some way of helping those who come in with either mundane queries or more academic research projects. And from simply passing through on my way upstairs to the research room, I can testify to the ever-friendly, busy-as-bees atmosphere among the museum staff as well, always seeming to be organising some visitor-friendly display or educational course. How on earth anyone can consider such – further- drastic cuts, as outlined by Mr Gregson, to these two vital community services I just cannot begin to understand.

  • Ivan Coghill

    • February 27th, 2015 14:20

    Short of funds? Why is the exclusive dining in Hays Dock Cafe subsidised? And no, it is not run on a break even basis. Sack the management and the board.

  • Sandy McDonald

    • February 28th, 2015 8:05

    Hopefully the council won’t succeed in destroying this fantastic and highly praised public amenity. I never tire of visiting the museum – and neither does my young daughter. And I still don’t understand what the fuss over the restaurant is. There are some folk that would happily see the excellent facilities around Hays Dock closed for good. Ba Humbug to the lot of them!


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.