SIC urged to put quality before cost-cutting in school decisions

Councillors should focus on providing quality education when they meet next week, and not just on finances.

That is the warning of local EIS secretary Steve Davidson following a report which recommends that the SIC should push ahead with statutory consultation on closing Aith and Sandwick Junior High Schools.

The council could save £2.3 million if members favour a major overhaul of the secondary education system when they meet on Wednesday. That could provide a signifi­cant dent into the council’s efforts to shave £3.25 million from its education budget.

Approving next week’s recommendations would mean youngsters from Aith will transfer to the Anderson High School in August next year.

Meanwhile Sandwick pupils will go to the AHS in 2016 once the new high school has been built – or earlier if the existing school can find room for them.

Councillors are also being urged to consider axing secondary education in Whalsay, Yell and Unst for S3 and S4 pupils from 2015/16. That will mean youngsters being sent to the AHS from the beginning of their third year.

The recommendations were released a day after youngsters presented postcards listing their favoured after-school hobbies to council­lors. The children fear increased journey times due to school closures will impact on their leisure time once their lessons have finished (see separate story on page six).

Mr Davidson said the SIC must enjoy the dubious accolade of taking the longest time possible to reach a final decision on its education provision.

He called on councillors to bear in mind the effect possible closures have on pupil and staff morale.

Mr Davidson said: “Shetland EIS members are particularly concerned by the effect protracted indecision is having on pupil and teacher morale, never mind the potential it has to divide communities.

“Shetland Islands Council surely must have set a record for the longest time for any local authority to come to a decision on its education provision.

“We urge councillors to ensure that any decisions made at the forthcoming education and families committee meeting focus on the future of Shetland education and not solely finances.

“Although Shetland’s economy is going through a tough time at the moment the situation may improve. Decisions made now should consider future economic recovery. We would encourage councillors to listen to and take heed of all stakeholders when steering Shetland education to a bright future.”

The proposals by independent education consultant Don Leding­ham recommend an ambitious part­ner­ship be forged between Shet­land’s two high schools and the further education sector. SIC chief executive Mark Boden would lead the co-ordination of the alliance.

A “Shetland learning campus” could also be created, allowing schools to be seen as “inter­connected” learning environments.

John Haswell of Aith Parent Council said he was “extremely disappointed” by the proposals to close Aith and Sandwick, and also for the other junior highs going down to S1/S2 – although he welcomed the idea of schools and colleges working together.

He said: “I wouldn’t dismiss the report out of hand. But I think as far as the junior high school model goes, it’s a very negative, retrograde step.”

Mr Haswell said the Our Schools Our Future campaign run by Aith Action Group would be stepped up.

“Not only is it carrying on – I think it goes to its next stage. The whole of the West Side is remarkably and beautifully united in its oppos­ition to proposals to close Aith Junior High School.

“Up until this point we have been supportive and desperately anxious to engage with the education department.

“But the fact that this report has come out and the proposals that are going up to the council next week certainly won’t deflect us from our prime objective which is to see the future of education protected for West Side bairns.”

Acting chairwoman of Sandwick parent council, Jane Matthews, said education would suffer if the school’s secondary department closed.

She said: “It’s early days and we haven’t had a chance to digest the news or gather the views from the parents formally, but I know from what has gone before there will be huge disappointment across the South Mainland at this news that the council is going to move towards the closure of Sandwick secondary department.

“We need to look pragmatically at the situation and start a plan for a measured approach.”

The recent scrutiny of the school estate comes after a decision by councillors in September to discard previous plans in favour of a comp­lete re-examination of secondary education.

The proposals going before coun­cillors next week represent a combination of possibilities taken from five different options presented at public meetings in October.

In his report Professor Ledingham points to the halving of council reserves from £400 million, with £60,000 having to be taken from reserves daily in order to meet the gap between expenditure and income.

Teaching Shetland’s 1,453 second­ary pupils costs the SIC £12,826, Prof Ledingham says – over £3,000 more than in both Orkney and the Western Isles.

His recommendations are broken down into three sections.

The first part relates to the school/college partnership, which pulls together feedback that showed people were enthusiastic about schools and colleges working together.

Part two focuses on the learning campus, which builds upon some of the ideas presented in the “telepres­ence” option previously put forward. If implemented, it could develop on-line access to all curricular learning materials at secondary schools.

The final section, part three, is about the “rationalisation” of second­ary education provision. It highlights the “very little support” in communities for pupils to transfer to a new school at the end of S3. It therefore recommends a move from junior highs to the Anderson after pupils have completed their S2 education.

Director of children’s services Helen Budge said the proposals made by Prof Ledingham offered the best opportunity for pupils to learn.

She defended the service against claims education was becoming too centralised.

“We think, for an educational experience, S1 to S6 is best,” Mrs Budge said. “Where that is not pos­sible, due to geographical reasons, we would want to see them retained in their community – which is the opposite of centralisation – for a period of time, and coming to get the best education for their senior phase.”

Mrs Budge said the postcards presented by West Side youngsters would be taken into account.

“We do ken, logistically, that it’s not everybody who is travelling up to 65 minutes [to school or home on a bus], because not everybody stays at the absolute farthest away point.

“We do ken that some young folk from the West Side do come and stay in the hostel. Equally, we ken that some young folk that could stay in the hostel choose to travel.”

Mrs Budge also paid tribute to education staff who had been invol­ved in the process.

“It has been a huge piece of work and lots of staff have worked very hard on it, and we have really tried very hard to make sure all the detail is there for councillors to make an informed decision.”

However, Mr Davidson has also highlighted concerns about the time being spent by education officials preparing reports for the council. He said: “This is a time of great upheaval in Scottish education with teachers working hard to develop and deliver new courses under the auspices of Curriculum for Excellence.

“All of this is taking place against a backdrop of spending cuts and shortages of materials. Now more than ever they need support from central service education staff to help deliver these courses to the tight deadline set by the Scottish government.

“It is time for councillors to recognise that education lies at the heart of the Shetland community and to ensure that adequate resour­cing is available to prevent the erosion of this vital service.”

 The secondary departments at Aith and Sandwick have been recommended for closure. Photo: Dave Donaldson
The secondary departments at Aith and Sandwick have been recommended for closure. Photo: Dave Donaldson


Add Your Comment
  • John K Smith

    • November 11th, 2013 14:41

    I agree with EIS secretary Steve Davidson, our young peoples’ education and the communities they live and learn in are more important than council finances. There is a way to keep the schools open – AS THEY ARE NOW –

    In support of this fight I have today written to each member of the Education and Families Committee, to our MP Alistair Carmichael and to our MSP Tavish Scott with the following open letter:

    This is an open letter to our councillors, MSP and MP.

    As a councillor you know well how badly the closure of Sandwick JHS and Aith JHS will affect our young peoples’ education and the Sandwick/Aith communities in which they live.

    The recent Leddingham report has no educational merit whatsoever. It is discredited in all our eyes and MUST GO NO FURTHER.

    I therefore call upon you to reject both the Leddingham Report as well as the additional report called “A Strategy for Secondary Education in Shetland” at the forthcoming Education and Families Committee special meeting on 13 November 2013..

    In addition I call on you to commence a Campaign to keep Sandwick JHS and Aith JHS open
    AS THEY ARE NOW and to find the money to do so. I suggest you seek that money, a very small amount, from whatever or whoever you can; you could write to The Scottish Government and ask for it, ask Shetland Islands Council to raise a special council tax for it, write to the UK Government and ask for a special grant, go on Breakfast TV and ask for it, contact all friends of Shetland in the entertainment industry and everyone who does business here including Petrofac, Serco Group, TESCO, Total Oil, Dong Energy, Seafood Shetland and all the local businesses.

    Please stop these closures now and let Shetland move forward with no more threats to young people or communities.
    Our young people and our communities are Shetland’s Future
    Monday 11 November 2013

  • John Tulloch

    • November 11th, 2013 16:23

    I must say I find some of Professor Ledingham’s reported comments baffling, to say the least.

    First, I’m unsure why he is commenting on the SIC’s finances, his job was surely to look at improving the education system in a cost-effective manner, not to prepare us for painful cost cuts; that’s none of his business.

    Second, he trots out the fallacy of comparing costs with the Scottish average and Orkney and the Western Isles. This is particularly disappointing from a person bearing the title “professor” since it is clear to any normal person that because of Shetland’s geography and transport links that none of these comparisons is valid. He has failed at the most basic level by purporting to compare “apples with apples” when, in fact, he is comparing “apples with something completely different”.

    Third, he notes “the very little support in communities for pupils to transfer to a new school at the end of S3” and then proceeds to recommend a move to the Anderson after pupils have completed their S2 education! It’s not often it happens but words fail me, here; this is completely baffling. Is he saying there is support for a move after S2?

    Contrary to what we were told, previously, about “telepresence” being educationally useless, Ledingham picks up the idea, recommending a “learning campus” to build on the enthusiasm for closer links between schools and colleges (great idea, no beefs, here!) by making all curriculum materials available on line.

    He should have stopped while he was on a winner but he goes on to suggest closing down both Aith and Sandwick, plus the S3 and S4 sections of the isles schools. Given that the suggestion of “telepresence” was intended to help keep the schools open, this inconsistency is, once more, baffling.

    Is this really the basis on which we are proposing to wreak irreparable damage on our thriving country communities?

  • Hazel Spence

    • November 11th, 2013 23:02

    The council have to make a decision of the highest degree on Wednesday effecting every single family in rural Shetland. This decision will be made based upon an unethical report on the future education of our children. If it costs roughly £9,000 to educate an Unst bairn per year then what is the benefit and ‘savings’ in putting them to the hostel for a further two years which costs roughly £18,000. Surely this makes no financial sense alone never mind the detrimental effect on the child’s emotional and social wellbeing.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.