Reprieve for closure-threatened schools

Closure-threatened primary schools in Northmavine have been given a reprieve after councillors stepped back from letting the axe fall.

Members of the education and families committee showed little appetite for closing Urafirth and North Roe primaries during a lengthy debate in the town hall.

Chairwoman Vaila Wishart moved North Roe alone be closed, but lost 7-4 after a counter motion was put forward by North Mainland member Andrea Manson.

A subsequent motion from Ms Wishart to retain the Urafirth school and nursery gained unanimous approval.  It followed more than three hours of discussion after a report was presented by quality improvement manager, Audrey Edwards.

It recommended the closure of both North Roe and Urafirth primaries next year – along with Urafirth’s nursery. Youngsters faced having their lessons continued in Ollaberry instead.

The plans came as part of the second phase of the renewed “blueprint for education” proposals, with an anticipated annual saving of £156,000 – reduced from over £190,000 once transport costs were factored in.

Children’s services have already saved £7.5 million in the last few years, however a further £4.673 million is being sought within the next six years.

Mrs Edwards said bringing the schools together would provide more educational benefits for youngsters, offering a better learning environment and a chance for children to mix more with their peers. But the proposals caused consternation among parents.

Yesterday a petition bearing 212 signatures was presented to SIC convener Malcolm Bell.

Today’s meeting heard widespread concerns that travel times for children could go beyond the agreed 40 minute limit.

And socio-economic reports showed closing North Roe Primary School could herald a loss of jobs, with the head teacher being the only non-crofting full time post.

A similar impact would be felt in Urafirth, members were told, with the shop among businesses potentially losing trade.

Responding to questions from West Side member Frank Robertson, Mrs Edwards said amendments would be made if buses struggled to meet the 40 minute time limit.

Members were told of the 36 minutes it took for secondary pupils to travel from North Roe to Brae High School – a route which includes five pick-up points.

SIC Councillor Alastair Cooper pic 2
Alastair Cooper: Questions over bus journey times.

But Ms Manson raised the possibility of extra buses having to be laid on – while fellow councillor for the area, Alastair Cooper, insisted a three minute gap would be needed at stops for the driver to ensure children were properly seated and secured for the journeys.

Ms Manson said an impressive tally of 53 pupils was anticipated across the three schools by 2019/20 – and that did not include the “buns in the oven” that were known about already. The figure is up considerably from the 30 youngsters children’s services anticipates will be in the schools next year.

Asked whether she felt, as an ex-teacher, that contact with pupils remained of a better standard in smaller school, Mrs Edwards said the service had studied research from the Sutton Trust which showed smaller class sizes were a “high cost strategy” with low impact.

A key factor among the proposals is the anticipated cost of keeping the school buildings at North Roe and Urafirth fully up to scratch.
Combined maintenance savings over the next five years have been estimated at over £95,000.

Ms Manson wondered if the high maintenance cost at North Roe, estimated at £85,000 over the same period, was because of regular repeated periods where closure was a very real threat.

Mrs Edwards admitted maintenance budgets had been reduced, but not to the extent that schools were put in a deteriorating condition.

Other questions came from North Isles member Robert Henderson. He wondered how the costs of operating the schools compared with those in Orkney or the Western Isles. Specific figures for this year were not available at the meeting, but the committee was told primary statistics were comparable with other island groups.

“It’s back to my argument, ” concluded Mr Henderson. “If things are not broken, why fix them?”

Fellow North Isles councillor Gary Cleaver said it would be wrong for Shetland to compare itself with other areas.

Peter Campbell said it was right to recognise how fragile communities could be. He said a “cyclical pattern” had emerged, with North Roe fluctuating over 40 years between a one and two-teacher school. He questioned whether Ollaberry would be granted a five year moratorium on closure if the schools in

Urafirth and North Roe should be spared the axe. He imagined a “ridiculous” potential scenario where the receiving school in the current consultation is earmarked for possible closure in a future one.

However, political leader Gary Robinson said the council had to operate in challenging times, and questioned why there had been a decline if schools were the best way of retaining population.

George Smith:
George Smith: “Not convinced” Northmavine needs three primary schools to thrive.

Vice-chairman George Smith said he had been weighing up whether to support the recommendations. He thanked Mrs Edwards for her presentation, and said he was “not convinced” Northmavine needed three schools to flourish.

Putting forward her motion, Ms Wishart said: “We know that children benefit from interaction with their peers.”

However, in her summing up Ms Manson said it was important to listen to what communities were saying.

“It’s very important to prove that consultation is not a box-ticking exercise,” she said.

The committe’s decision will go before members at the full council meeting tomorrow.


Add Your Comment

    • November 5th, 2014 16:53

    Thank goodness for some common sense, although the intemperate remarks of Councillors Wills and Duncan should cause concern in their loyal supporters.
    I genuinely believe that the vast majority of protestors against school closures want council expenditure to be prudently managed and within budget. However, we also passionately believe that closing schools, and destroying fragile communities, is not the right way to do it. There have to be other options, within other departments.
    I am sure that there are enough seasoned financial professionals in Shetland to create a small, unpaid team, to analyse SIC expenditure and to recommend appropriate cuts. I had hoped that the recent budget “consultation” might have provided the stimulus for such an initiative, but Councillor Robinson clearly saw it as a platform to expound his personal views.

    Alan Skinner
    New House


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.