Cooper bars public from meeting on promoting Shetland

The divisive idea that a meeting discussing the case for promoting Shetland should be held in private left the council chamber split this morning.

Before the meeting got under way chairman of the special development committee Alastair Cooper suggested that members of the public and the press should be removed from the chamber to avoid disclosure of commercially sensitive information.

This motion was seconded by vice-chairman Theo Smith but was questioned by former deputy leader of the council Billy Fox.

Mr Fox queried the U-turn, noting that a previous meeting on the same topic was originally to be held in private before being changed to a public meeting.

Unsure of the validity of Mr Cooper’s reasoning Mr Fox then motioned for the meeting to go ahead in public as originally planned.

Amanda Westlake seconded this, meaning that the issue went to a vote.

Before going to a vote Mr Cooper asked Leisel Gair to read the passages in the relevant legislation which he thought justified his motion. Nobody on the opposing side was allowed a rebuttal.

After votes were cast, by way of raising a hand, it was found that the chamber was evenly split.

Mr Cooper, Mr Smith, Mark Burgess and Robert Henderson were in favour of removing the public, while Mr Fox, Ms Westlake, Andrea Manson and council leader Gary Robinson were in favour of keeping the debate public.

As a result of the tie Mr Cooper cast his deciding vote as chairman.

This meant that Shetland Amenity Trust general manager Jimmy Moncrieff and councillor and amenity trust member Frank Robertson had to leave the chamber, alongside members of the press.

• More in this week’s Shetland Times


Add Your Comment
  • ian tinkler

    • September 1st, 2016 7:35

    “The case for promoting Shetland should be held in private” Because “disclosure of commercially sensitive information.”! No wonder people are suspicious of some of these clowns, just what are they trying to hide? One cannot help but wonder whom they are protecting from public scrutiny? A few of the usual suspects feathering their own or their pals nests perhaps? A few answers please, what can possibly be “Commercially sensitive” about promoting Shetland? Is it perhaps more about promoting and protecting vested interests?

    • Steven Jarmson

      • September 1st, 2016 19:55

      I think “commercially sensative” is code for “we’ve got nothing, how do we dig ourselves out of this hole? I’ve got it, put on a big face and make out we haven’t just been sitting watching ‘funny cats’ on YouTube.”
      Utterly pathetic.
      These people need replaced.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.