Council’s £265,000 rent for empty North Ness building

Shetland Islands Council has paid £264,834.50 in rent for its North Ness headquarters since evacuating the building on 20th September because of structural problems.

The figure, disclosed by the council under a freedom of information request from this paper, covers the council’s rent to Shetland Leasing and Property from 1st October till today. It does not include rent paid earlier that would cover the period from the evacuation in September until 1st October.

The council also explains its decision to lease the £7.3m building over 30 years at £467,000 per annum for a total cost of £14.01m plus inflation. According to the reply from legal team leader Susan Brunton the decision to lease was taken to avoid depleting the council’s reserves and also to benefit the community via Slap as a subsidiary of the charitable trust.

The reply says: “The lease arrangement was entered into by the council with Slap following consideration by the council of alternative funding models rather than committing large capital sums to building projects, which would have a detrimental impact on the council’s reserves. The council considered professional advice on the terms of the arrangement, which provides a benefit to the Shetland Community as Slap is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Shetland Charitable Trust.”

In effect, the democratically elected council is paying the arm’s length subsidiary of the non-elected trust almost twice the cost of the building in real terms, spread over a 30-year period. The lease deal was considered by the services committee and approved by the full council.

The “White House” as 8 North Ness is popularly known is insured by the SIC but the problems identified with the floors are not covered by insurance.

The lease for the building was drawn up by Slap and revised by the council’s legal staff before being signed by a council solicitor.

Although the council’s communication department said last month that there was no completion certificate for the building, Mrs Brunton’s reply states that temporary occupation for the building was granted from 19th April 2012 and acceptance of the completion certificate was received on 8th September 2012.

In all 21 questions were put to the council which replied to nine of them.

Others, on whether a settlement had been reached over the dispute and if so how much is to be paid and whether the council is totally liable for the cost of remedial works, went unanswered on the grounds that the SIC must maintain third-party confidentiality.

The same exemptions were invoked when the council declined to answer whether overloading of the floors had contributed to the problems, whether investigations are ongoing, the exact nature of the problems, what remedial work is needed, the timescale for this, council liability as project manager and when defects with the floor first emerged.

The council’s reply says: “In weighing up the public interest in disclosure
against the public interest in withholding the information, we recognise that there is clearly a general public interest in information being accessible and a local interest in this topic.

“However, there is in our view a stronger public interest in allowing us to obtain confidential information and utilise such information to fully inform our decision-making processes and procedures. Accordingly, we consider that the public interest in this case in disclosing the requested information is outweighed by the public interest in maintaining the exemption.”

The council also declined to say if any staff member had been disciplined over the White House fiasco on the grounds that would breach data protection rules.


Add Your Comment
  • Ian Tinkler

    • April 1st, 2017 9:40

    I do hope this is an April ist?

  • John Ridland

    • April 1st, 2017 9:55

    Ha Ha,, Yeah good wan “Shetland times” April 1st Joke……. Isn,t it ?

  • Johan Adamson

    • April 4th, 2017 8:53

    Im sure the councillors said SIC was not paying rent whilst there was no occupation of the building, but cant remember where they said this. But it is unclear whether this is rent or mortgage/ PFI?

    • Ian Tinkler

      • April 4th, 2017 10:25

      So secretive, Johan. Meeting held in camera no doubt to save the embarrassment of the media glare. SIC, SCT, SLAP Shetland’s very own swamp. Cool on the alternative facts as Trump would say!!! About time it was drained.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.