14th November 2018
Established 1872. Online since 1996.

Hill refuses to submit return of election expenses

Maverick campaigner Stuart Hill has refused to submit a return of his election expenses, as required by UK law.

Mr Hill, who stood in this year’s general election under the Shetland Orkney Sovereignty (Shors) banner – has dismissed the Wesminster campaign as “illegal”.

He insists that Alistair Carmichael, who was returned to the Orkney and Shetland seat on an increased majority, has “absolutely no authority” to represent the isles.

Mr Hill has campaigned for years that Shetland does not rightfully belong to the United Kingdom.

He says he notified Prime Minister Theresa May and others that the election was “illegal”.

“Before the UK general election I notified the Prime Minister, the Electoral Commission, the returning officer, deputy returning officer and all the other candidates that the election was illegal because no Scottish court has heard any evidence that Shetland and Orkney are part of Scotland,” Mr Hill stated.
“Unless they can be proved to be part of Scotland, there can be no legal UK elections here.

“Deputy returning officer Jan Riise was the only one to reply. All he could do was raise some inconsequential points, but was unable to rebut anything in my notice.

“I got a reminder from Fiona Ratter at Orkney Islands Council of the deadline for the return of donations and expenses. I informed her that, because the election was illegal and a fraud on the people of Orkney and Shetland, I had no intention of compounding the fraud and would not be submitting any return.

“If this is an offence, it pales into insignificance beside that of holding of an illegal election.

“Not only was the election illegal, the result was null and void and Alistair Carmichael has absolutely no authority to act as a member of parliament.”

4 comments

  1. Brian Smith

    In December Stuart Hill wrote a letter to the Shetland Times with an explanation why Shetland is part of Scotland. It looks as if he has forgotten that.

    Reply
    • Martin Tregonning

      I am just interested in the logic which says that submitting an return of election expenses would be “compunding the fraud” of what Mr Hill claims is an illegal election but actually standing in that election is okay.

      By Mr Hill’s logic, his standing in the election means he was part of an illegal conspiracy.

      Reply
    • Ali Inkster

      Dat wis during Yule, he wis likly drunk. whit’s dy excuse?

      Reply
  2. Brian Smith

    Dat’s da second joke by Ali I’m laughed at dis year!

    Reply

Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.