Same tired old games (Jamie Halcro Johnston)

Regrettably, Humza Yousaf has once again chosen to play politics and attack MSPs who have stood up for the interests of Orkney and Shetland at Holyrood while he and his SNP colleagues were trying for months to pretend that their long-standing commitment to fair funding did not exist.

There is little doubt that, without this issue being raised up the political agenda, the SNP would have dropped their pledge to the people of the islands like a stone. So it is a shame that Mr Yousaf continues to play the same tired old games, even after the commendable efforts of councillors and MSPs of all parties and none has secured at least some action towards correcting this patently unfair situation.

The transport minister is right in congratulating the island councils for their tenacity in pursuing this issue. It’s just a shame it was the actions – or inactions – of his SNP government which forced them to be so tenacious.

And what is now abundantly clear is that, in spite of the SNP’s protests, the money was always available to address this issue. The SNP managed to magic up an extra £170 million; yesterday which, apparently, they didn’t have when the budget was first presented. So the question many in the Northern Isles should be asking Mr Yousaf is why didn’t the SNP include fair funding in their draft budget in the first place?

When SNP ministers were trying to dismiss fair funding, I was regularly questioning them in the Scottish Parliament on their commitment. I was meeting with representatives from the island councils – in Lerwick, in Kirkwall and in Edinburgh.

I put forward the amendment which, accepted by the entire Scottish Parliament (including Mr Yousaf and the SNP), recognised the lifeline nature of our internal ferries. And I wrote to Mr Yousaf and to his boss, Nicola Sturgeon, on the issue.

So I suppose it is flattering that, of all the opposition MSPs who voted against the SNP Budget, Mr Yousaf has chosen to single me out in this way for his faux outrage. I would suggest it’s an indication of the effectiveness of my consistent and vocal opposition to the SNP’s attempt to sweep its own fair funding pledge under the carpet.

And in relation to the vote itself, Mr Yousaf seems intent on misleading Shetlanders. The truth is that MSPs do not vote on individual parts of the budget, but rather on the budget as a whole.

So, even with the late U-turn on additional ferry funding, this budget remains, overall, a disappointing budget for people and businesses in Shetland. It will mean that many of my constituents – in fact, anyone earning over £26,000 per year – will pay more tax.

It will hit the incomes of local people and businesses, something numerous business organisations have warned will harm Scotland’s already sluggish economic growth. And it leaves our local councils across the region still having to make tough spending decisions. So it is for those local and regional MSPs who supported the SNP’s budget to defend their decision. I simply wasn’t prepared to back a budget which will leave too many local people out of pocket.

And an inconvenient fact Mr Yousaf, too busy patting himself on the back for belatedly delivering something even the SNP in Orkney accept was always an SNP commitment, choses to ignore is that this is only a deal for this year and not a long term solution. So the real risk is that we will have to go through this process all over again for next year’s budget.

I hope next year, the SNP will deliver a long term settlement on fair funding, not another one off. That a long-term solution will be found that will meet the needs of the local communities so reliant on these lifeline links. And that Mr Yousaf, Derek Mackay and the SNP will avoid the political theatrics that have dominated this year’s budget process.

Jamie Halcro Johnston
Conservative MSP
The Scottish Parliament,


Add Your Comment
  • John Jamieson

    • February 4th, 2018 8:53

    After making such a sustained effort on behalf of the islanders why on earth did he ( and so many Highlands and Islands MSPs ) risk losing it all by voting against the Scottish Budget as a whole ?
    If all politicians behaved in this manner it is likely that every budget in every parliament would fail, even though every single clause had enthusiastic and popular local backing no one was willing to support the package as a whole.

    • Bill Adams

      • February 6th, 2018 16:11

      Mr Halcro – Johnston is under orders from his boss Colonel Davidson, insubordination not tolerated.
      As a result he continually whines on that those whose earnings are over £26,000 will be paying more
      tax than their counterparts south of the Border.
      What he constantly and deliberately fails to mention is the fact that those of us whose incomes are
      less than £26,000 will pay less than their contemporaries elsewhere in the UK.
      That includes not only low paid workers but also the vast majority of island pensioners.
      Clearly these are not the section of his constituents Mr Halcro – Johnston is interested in.

      • Gordon Harmer

        • May 31st, 2018 19:32

        So someone who earnes less than £26,000 as a basic wage works enough hours overtime so they earn more get screwed. Any one with the tenacity to better themselves, which means a massive amount of Scots, will be penalised by a penny pinching SNP government.
        The tartan Tories are living up to their name for sure and their blind supporters still try to defend them.

  • Stuart Hannay

    • July 3rd, 2018 15:35

    Mr Halcrow objects to political parties playing games?

    “Among those that have been filibustered or otherwise blocked by Christopher Chope since 2013 include scrapping hospital parking charges for carers. He also objected to a bill to formally pardon the Second World War code breaker Alan Turing of his “indecency” conviction for the so-called crime of being gay.

    Which party does Christopher ‘up-skirting’ Chope belong to again?


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.