Worries continue about loaded tankers anchoring close in

Council officials are said to be “working to clarify” the reasons why tankers from fully loaded tankers from Sullom Voe Terminal are anchoring close to the Shetland Mainland.

The matter, which has been raised by former councillor Jonathan Wills, is on the agenda at Wednesday’s SIC harbour board meeting.

Papers before the meeting state: “On recent occasions, some tankers have been using the area south of Lerwick to break passage for extended periods.

“The council is working to clarify the reasons for that change of practice with the oil industry, and seek to return to direct approach and departure of Sullom Voe Terminal tankers to and from Shetland waters without in-shore layby.”

Dr Wills, in his role as honorary warden of Noss Nature Reserve, said he was relieved that officials were on to the situation. The tankers were using the area between Noss and Mousa as a “floating crude oil storage area”, he said, and he hoped the council would return to former “prudent custom and practice” which kept  the vessels more than 20 miles offshore, except when entering or leaving Sullom Voe.

Dr Wills said: ” It is, however, astonishing that the council has not simply informed the oil companies that it requires them immediately to abide by the agreement they voluntarily entered into many decades ago, and which there is no reason to alter.

“It is indeed true that ‘useful lessons can be learned and shared’ from recent multiple breaches of the agreement — described as a ‘purported’ agreement by an ignorant press officer for the Maritime and Coastguard Agency in Southampton.

“The most useful lesson is perhaps that emollient waffle by council representatives, apparently trying to ingratiate themselves with the oil companies, is unacceptable to the public who pay their salaries.

“We expect them to make sure the oil industry fully complies at all times with ‘The Shetland Standard’ of environmental protection, so loudly trumpeted by councillors in the aftermath of the Braer oil spill 28 years ago.

“The current failure to do this does indeed ‘prejudice environmental protection’.  It also encourages the industry to believe that these sensible safety precautions are negotiable.  They are not.”


Add Your Comment
  • Grace Garrison

    • February 7th, 2021 18:49

    I agree with Dr. Wills concerning the loaded tankers being near the coastal land of Shetland or any of the Scottish Isles. In addition, an unloaded tanker isn’t much better if they “rinse out” near any lands. All energy products and shipping companies need to be required to work with all governments and their peoples.
    Thank you,
    Grace Garrison

  • Ali Inkster

    • February 7th, 2021 22:05

    Yet Dr Wills is a vociferous supporter of the habitat destroying windfarm being foisted on us.
    Double standards to say the least.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to editorial@shetlandtimes.co.uk for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.