Shutdown of major pipeline hastens calls for renewables transition to safeguard oil and gas jobs

Job fears have been highlighted after it emerged that one of the UK’s largest oil and gas fields looks set to shutdown.

The SIC’s infrastructure director John Smith said the Brent pipeline was likely to be decommissioned next year.

He told today’s (Tuesday) harbour board it represented the first “active step” in the conclusion of East of Shetland oil and gas.

Mr Smith also told the board that offshore maintenance in the Clair oilfield, West of Shetland, this summer was likely to have affected production and tanker movements.

He said the shutdown last year had been “quite significant” and this year had also been an “extensive exercise”.

Shetland South member Robbie McGregor made several calls during the meeting to remain focussed on the “huge job opportunities”  available in the transition from oil and gas to renewables.

“I don’t want to hear, when I’m retired and sitting beside the fire, that we missed the boat as far as renewables are concerned,” he said.

“So I think we need to keep that right in the front of the agenda and ensure that long-term strategic plans are in place to make sure that the metaphorical boat, when it comes, we are jumping onto it.”

With oil throughput at Sullom Voe Terminal barely a fraction of its heyday in the 1980s, operator EnQuest has already begun its transition plans. 

The company’s half year report, published last week, said it was continuing to develop plans to transform the terminal for future energy uses, focused on carbon capture and storage, production of green hydrogen and electrification.

Mr Smith said that while oil and gas would continue for sometime, the transition had clearly begun.

“The objective and ambition for the Port of Sullom Voe and other associated ports is to find that transition from oil and gas to renewable energy but to do that while we are still active,” he said.

The director stressed the importance of making the transition when the council’s infrastructure and skilled staff were still in place.

“If we hit the point where infrastructure and services had to mothballed or set aside, then they will be much more difficult to relaunch again.”

Reflecting on comments by industry expert Paul de Leeuw, from Robert Gordon University, Mr Smith said: “There is a time to get this right and if we don’t the outcome will be much less beneficial.”

The board also heard of ongoing challenges from port infrastructure manager Andrew Inkster, who highlighted difficulties recruiting and retaining staff, contractor availability, extended delivery times and significant increases in prices for delivery and purchase.

Despite the difficulties, Mr Inkster assured the board critical maintenance was being completed at all times.

The harbour account at the end of quarter one was projected to show a surplus of £18.8m – and increase of £225,000 on the agreed budget – but this was before the Clair shutdown mentioned by Mr Smith.

Shetland Central member Davie Sandison said that despite the challenges, he was pleased to see performance had not been affected.

He appealed for assurances that the harbour account’s significant contribution to the council’s general budget was recognised as being of high risk to the stability of the council. 


Add Your Comment
  • Bob Marsh

    • September 13th, 2023 1:13

    The Shetlands should be a major power provider of the North. There needs to be motivation from SIC to that effect, a driving force as partner or owner, not constant capitulation to such as Scottish and UK governments and bodies like DECC, OGA/NSTA, and MCA.

    There’s a requirement from the UK market alone for O&G for decades. In 2022 Norway was paid £41 billion by the UK for energy imports in various forms. Somewhat ironic surely that it’s Norway’s Equinor snapping up major stake in Rosebank. Add in other large proven, but yet undeveloped O&G fields surrounding Shetland such as Cambo, Bentley, Bressay, one would consider there is much left for Shetland to participate in for public benefit, not as now anonymous corporations outwith with other priorities and limitations.

    This added to by renewables potential, sadly a missed public portion of same by not participating, partially or outright in Viking. Now the Shetland environment, onshore and offshore, is being carved up again for the major benefit of external interests, leaving for little relative gain a detritus behind for locals to endure.

    Judicious investment would contribute to the cost of greening the Shetland environment, ferries, tunnels/bridges, power costs, housing etc.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.