Councillors reverse planning decision on Papa Stour solar panels

Councillors have overturned a decision from the planning department to refuse solar panels on the Papa Stour kirk.

SIC planners had rejected an application for 12 panels on the roof on the historic building, saying it would have an “adverse visual impact” on the listed kirk.

The Papa Stour History and Community Group, who bought the dilapidated kirk from the Church of Scotland in 2016, had appealed the decision.

The group want to turn the building into a visitor centre and community hub, and said the panels would help them cut down on their electricity costs as well as mitigating climate change.

But planning officer Marianna Porter told Wednesday’s planning committee meeting that the panels would “not be in keeping with the historic appearance of the listed building”.

Peter Bardell, from the Papa Stour history group, said their actions had “saved this building” from falling into ruin.

He told members that water had been coming in through the roof and walls when they took it on, and it was now wind and water-tight.

Councillors said they felt they had done an impressive amount of work to save the building, and that the solar panels would not have much effect on such a small community.

“This group have done a huge amount of work and a lot of research to get this church building into a usable condition for the community,” Catherine Hughson said.

“We can’t lose sight of the size of the Papa Stour community, and there isn’t a lot of buildings on Papa Stour that can be used for community use.

“I think they should be allowed to put solar panels where they are.”

Mark Robinson agreed, saying that the work of the group was “absolutely amazing”.

And chairman Robbie McGregor, who said he looked out onto a derelict church building in Quarff, said he was “so jealous” of what the Papa Stour community group had achieved.

The committee agreed to overturn the planning department’s decision and to approve the application.


Add Your Comment
  • Dr Ann Henderson

    • October 29th, 2023 23:48

    well done. Planners have no appreciation of the difficulties and costs involved with listed buildings. These buildings will have to be adapted to modern standards or die.I have the same problem in Cornwall. I have a large house that needs a new roof but on the listing this is scantled. It hasn’t had a scantle roof since 1952 and nobody has noticed. Its in the High Street! But no, normal modern slate will not do. £100,000 instead of £26,000. Plain stupidity, after 5 years of weather you can’t see the difference.


Add Your Comment

Please note, it is the policy of The Shetland Times to publish comments and letters from named individuals only. Both forename and surname are required.

Comments are moderated. Contributors must observe normal standards of decency and tolerance for the opinions of others.

The views expressed are those of contributors and not of The Shetland Times.

The Shetland Times reserves the right to decline or remove any contribution without notice or stating reason.

Comments are limited to 200 words but please email longer articles or letters to for consideration and include a daytime telephone number and your address. If emailing information in confidence please put "Not for publication" in both the subject line and at the top of the main message.

200 words left

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Get Latest News in Your Inbox

Join the The Shetland Times mailing list to get one daily email update at midday on what's happening in Shetland.